Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Is anybody ever going to do a fully-corrected Niagara drawing?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cpt. Kyle Amasov: [QB] Funny I see this right at the moment. Guess what's the next ship on my 'to do'-list for the size comparison chart? Right. One thing I noticed; using the factfiles-schematic (corrected or not), the ship would be 580m long. For my first comparison I used the Galaxy-nacelles, but then I noticed the secondary hull is Ambassador. So I took the 526m-Ambassador as a reference. And the 580m-Niagara was the result. Otherwise, I got something around 500m. What do you think? Galaxy-nacelles or Ambassador-hull? (Furthermore, the whole saucer dome is just the standard-Ambassador's, turned 180�. And the saucer seems to be an Ambassador-modification, too.) While currently at it, what about the Freedom-class? Here I wanted to use the Galaxy-nacelle-comparison, too. We'd get a 400-something scale. But the factfiles-schematic showed only a five-deck connecting dorsal. Going that way (I don't know where the ff get their info, but we have to assume they have some sort of insider information on it) we'd get a 230m-Freedom. First, the ship looked fake being that small, but assuming it's some sort of destroyed like Hermes and friends, the size would be perfect. So? What should I do? (Sorry Mim for using your topic for it, but it fits in here. ;) ) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3