Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Is anybody ever going to do a fully-corrected Niagara drawing?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cpt. Kyle Amasov: [QB] Hey, I'm going to upload my shipscale-list today, including two large charts of all the federation classes. For now, I took the (uncorrected) Niagara-schematic - Ambassador size. Maybe I'll redo the nacelles-part. What I can say is I had to redo both Nebula-Melbourne (you can clearly see from the pictures at EAS that the small nacelles are attached to the base of the weapons-pod phylon and not to the secondary hull) and Shelley (I have a dozen different schematics of that ship, and all look different. So I decided to do my own version of the truth. ;) ) The Freedom is at the moment at ~ 230m (going with the windows), but maybe I'll change that. Maybe there's another base for the Freedom-scaling. As mentioned above, the Niagara's and Ambassador's bridge dome module thing (the part on top of the saucer) is the same used for the Freedom. Niagara's main body and dome are of the same scale, meaning I could use the dome of the Niagara to scale the Freedom. (I did basically the same when figuring out the size of the Springfield, allthough I used the Cheyenne-nacelles as reference.) Let's see how much time I got at hand today and tell me what exactly has to be altered on the FactFiles schematic. The redone nacelle phylons are one thing already done. I'll rescale the nacelles. What else? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3