Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Merrimack in "Birthright" (TNG)/Cochrane in "The Game" (TNG)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mark Nguyen: [QB] That was most likely the Leeds, as the new OP sequence featuring her docked there had premiered just two episodes earlier, and the odds are they wouldn't re-label the model like that. Re: The Prometheus, I'm of the belief that the script *intended* for the ship to be some generic Federation Starship, with the intent of it being an Oberth or Miranda or something else. When the time came for the model to be chosen, for whatever reason someone ended up choosing the Nebbie model. Were it almost any other model *but* the Nebula or any ship at one point named Enterprise, it would have made a hell of a lot more sense. Re: The Odyssey, yes its bridge set was a re-use of this one, itself just a chunk of the TOS Movie Enterprise bridge from ST 5-7. The reason they didn't use the Generations bridge was that it was being used / abused for the movie, and to reassemble it or restore it afterwards would have been far too prohibitive. It fits far better anyway if the Odyssey bridge we saw was that ship's battle bridge, which I like to believe in spite of seeing the dedication plaque at the back of the set. Mark [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3