Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Crew complement of the Norway class
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Reverend: [QB] The line was more like [i]"Sir, the Admiral's ship has been destroyed."[/i] No name was specifically mentioned. The Admiral's ship was supposed to be a new design called the ENDEAVOUR, with the intention that we'd see it's destruction during the battle. It was later ditched in favour of showing the Defiant when Worf was written into the script. However I belive there was an ENDEAVOUR mentioned in the radio chatter but it's arguable as to wether or not the Nebula-Class ship seen in the battle (after the line about Hayes's ship) was the ENDEAVOUR NCC-71805 - supposedly the lone survivor of Wolf 359 - or the LEEDS NCC-70352. If it was the ENDEAVOUR then the Admiral's ship could have been called anything (perhaps that's where the Hiroshima comes from?). Personally I'd much rather have the old ENDEAVOUR survive both Borg attacks than it be a new design, just to prove that a ship doesn't have to be called Enterprise in order to survive impossible odds. ;-) Asside from that, if the ENDEAVOUR was the lone survivor of W359 then it would make perfect sense for it to be present during the Typhon incursion, especially with the Enterpise relegated to patrol duty. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3