Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Fighters, Peregrines, and Antares (oh my)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by SoundEffect: [QB] Thanks for the confirmation Capt. I wasn't comparing the window as the windows are in fact different, but I was comparing the angles and size of the top panel of the shuttlepod with the top panel of the fighter. The sloping angle of the front window area is the same based on the side as well. (Capt., do what you did above but use the side view this time.) Using the same comparison, I still get 12.5m. The shuttlepod set was used for filming Cal & pal in the fighter's interior, so the external values for the shuttlepod still hold. Yes the actor that played Hudson was a big guy but he was still sitting in the shuttlepod cockpit. Remember too that the shuttlepod's front window panel area is removable for in-close filming, so making another panel with a differently shaped window isn't hard to do. What measurements are you using for the shuttlepod? According to the prop/set size the overall length is 11'8" despite what the Tech Manuals may have. The roof area is exactly 6' long and 4' wide. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3