Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Sci-Fi
»
Designs, Artwork, & Creativity
»
The Connie Bashes - A Brief Summary
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] Well, y'know, on the Connie studio model, there were no torp tubes either. Those two little things in the front of the bridge mound were [i]windows[/i]. The thing is, while FJ's depiction of the Connie is inaccurate to the model, the Hermes, Saladin, Ptolemy, and Federation [i]have no model to be inconsistent with.[/i] Why assume that they too are "incorrect" when they're fine the way they are? Why ret-con them to simply be consistent with the Connie, when they are in fact separate ships? Contemporary, similar, but not necessarily [i]identical in all their components[/i]. Their details are different from those of the Connie. They *do* have torpedo launchers and phaser mounts visible. What's wrong with that? Last time I checked, people were COMPLAINING about the fact that the Connie had no such discernable features. Why must this flaw apply to all TOS-era designs? -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3