Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Sci-Fi
»
Designs, Artwork, & Creativity
»
History of Starfleet hull markings
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] I'm sorry, [i]Monsieur[/i] Rapp, but my opinion of James Dixon is about as low as CaptainMike's Believe me, I am FULLY aware of the flaws in Mike Okuda's Chronology, but the fact is that it's the one that is utilized by TPTB. As much as a line about "300 years" in "Miri" (TOS) might indicate a 2260 date for the ep, we have a spoken reference to the exact date of the end of Kirk's five-year mission (2273) in "Q2" (VGR). Okuda made an elephantine snafu in not including TAS in the Chronolgy, and in rounding off dates too much, and in picking arbitrary dates for events that there was no real way to determine the timeframe of, but it's still a reasonably good reference. It's obvious that it needs to be updated and amended as things are pinned down by later shows, but as a loose guide it's okay. Even though not great, its still far better (read as "far more relevant") than Dixon's leviathan jumble of obscure fandom gobbledygook pulled out of hundreds of fanboy asses over the years. -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3