Charles Capps
We appreciate your concern. It is noted and stupid.
Member # 9
posted
As you can see, the board has been updated to a new version.
If you don't notice the difference: *insert insult here*
Senior Members, Mods, and Admins can now change their titles using the profile edit page. Restricted HTML may be used.
The Senior Member threshold has been bumped to 750 posts to offset the lamosity. Existing members that reached the old 250 threshold will be unable to change their titles manually - but you can still ask an admin.
Messages may now only be edited for up to two hours since it was originally posted. Edits within 10 minutes of posting yield no "Edited by" message - those that make typos, rejoice. If the two hour limit turns out to not be enough, I can up it.
Have a nice day.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
/me nodds approvingly... I like, I like
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Could you fix it to where you click on the blue arrow beside the name of the last person who post take you to the new posts instead of that persons post?
posted
I think I liked the previous layout better, where the rows were closer together. The blue arrows space things out too much, and make it harder to review the forums at a glance. I suppose that the arrows can be useful, but I prefer to have things a bit closer together.
Still, it looks nice!
-------------------- “Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha
Registered: Nov 2000
| IP: Logged
Charles Capps
We appreciate your concern. It is noted and stupid.
Member # 9
posted
The space reason is why I've always been opposed to the feature - there's just no other way to lay it out without making the column widths all screwy.
I'll continue the play around with how it's done. At this point, it looks like the arrow icon will go away and the name will be linked instead. (The arrow is misleading - see BWC's post above about the wrong context...)
In the future (after this release goes out in a month or two), you will be able to choose whether or not you wish to see that feature at all.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
One thing I have been meaning to mention, and this seems like a good place, is the portion below the text box for posting....
Can you make the greamlins, buttons, and the sig/disable greamlins check boxes all one table???
This would make it easier to check the boxes without scrollng as much.... Relabel it "instant Options" to fit with the other headings....
-------------------- "You are a terrible human, Ritten." Magnus "Urgh, you are a sick sick person..." Austin Powers A leek too, pretty much a negi.....
Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
Charles Capps
We appreciate your concern. It is noted and stupid.
Member # 9
posted
It's not quite that easy - each of the tables can be turned on and off independantly.
I've updated the "last reply by..." link in the template to what we'll be using in all of our products - this is the final. Enjoy.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
OnToMars
Now on to the making of films!
Member # 621
posted
Gotta say, Charles, not a big fan of the "Re:"
But the control over the status line rules.
-------------------- If God didn't want us to fly, he wouldn't have given us Bernoulli's Principle.
Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
Topic Closed
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
If the two hour limit turns out to not be enough, I can up it.![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic