posted
Oh cheers. Once again I have to do all the work. I'm the one who has to tell Timmy up there that it's "shits and giggles", and I'm the one who has to think up a joke about Simon "Supersized" Sizers Supersized Sizing Situation.
Oi.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
posted
At least the Sun spelt Picard's name right this time. What was that article frmo a few months ago? "Star Trek went of the air in 1997 and there are no plans to make any more episodes"?
Brilliantly, they didn't even get past the first line of body text before they used a cliche!
Aren't you yanks jealous of our high quality tabloids?
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
posted
I went to the link in Bernd's first page, but it said invalid item. So what was it exactly?
-------------------- I'm slightly annoyed at Hobbes' rather rude decision to be much more attractive than me though. That's just rude. - PsyLiam, Oct 27, 2005.
Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I think I came into this discussion too late, because I'm not seeing anything except "invalid item." Pray tell, what was this?
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
Printer-friendly view of this topic
