posted
I thought this might interest some of you. A few months ago Gene Ray was invited to "debate" the Time Cube at a lecture series at MIT. The event is available for download, if you've got the time/bandwidth:
I have to confess that I'm a little...well, I don't know, put off, I suppose, by the whole thing. Mr. Ray is a kindly old gentleman who happens to be totally off his rocker. I'm not sure how inviting him to such an event for the sole purpose of laughing at the crazy old man sits with me.
posted
The links to the clips were refused when I tried ~2:30 US Pacific Time. The link to Gene Ray's website was... interesting?
-------------------- "Nah. The 9th chevron is for changing the ringtone from "grindy-grindy chonk-chonk" to the theme tune to dallas." -Reverend42
Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
I can't believe I glanced through that again.....
I emailed last time we had this here..... and he's serious.... especially to go to MIT....
Somebody got that screw driver????
Plus I just emailed him this..... Gene, You proably don't remember exchanging email with me, oh, 12 to 18 months ago, but i asked you if you were serious... Which I would imagine a lot of people do....
The question I have is: Why are you using the names for time of the day.... If you extend your theory out to it's ultimate goal then you do have multiple words, based on each second, or, even each fraction of a second. How do you deduce only the 4? When each second clicks over, everywhere and everytime? If there are 86,400 seconds per day wouldn't there be that many worlds??? And that is if we apply our man-made time to nature..... It seems to me that your theory is flawed, limiting nature as your are. Thank you for your time Gene Jason
[ April 17, 2002, 14:40: Message edited by: Ritten ]
-------------------- "You are a terrible human, Ritten." Magnus "Urgh, you are a sick sick person..." Austin Powers A leek too, pretty much a negi.....
Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
It seems to me that, at this point, attempting to logically explain why the Time Cube is...unworkable is a vast waste of time, and not really the point anyway.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
This is true, but I am fiddling around a little..... I am bored with 99.99% of my life now.....
his reply Do you know the difference between Nature's Time Cube and the human invented clock with its unnatural hours, minutes and seconds?
Gene Ray
I asked him to explain..... It would take four nights to download those movies under the conditions I have now.....
-------------------- "You are a terrible human, Ritten." Magnus "Urgh, you are a sick sick person..." Austin Powers A leek too, pretty much a negi.....
Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
Yeah, I posted about this a while ago. We're still waiting on Ultra Magnus to come up with something witty about it. Doesn't look like that's happening now.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
He hasn't replied to my question about his dividing the day in to 4 parts, instead of an infinite number based on each moment of rotation...... I told him he was debunking his own theory by limiting it to a cube.... I guess he didn't like that....
Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
No, it's just that you are trying to use logic on a man who believes that minutes are a conspiracy. It's not going to work.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Printer-friendly view of this topic
