posted
I'm currently on 56k dial-up, so are my parents and sister (we all live in the same house, but access the Net at different times).
I want broadband, but that's not feasable as we'd likely have to have a network installed to like all 3 PCs/laptops to the one modem (please correct me if I'm wrong). So I was thinking of getting an ADSL modem for my PC only to speed things up.
Your advice on what to do and what is involved in going ADSL/Broadband would be appreciated (I trust you all better than the guys in the shops).
-------------------- If you cant convince them, confuse them.
Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
Installing a network to share an internet connection is child's play, but let's not get ahead of ourselves just yet. Two questions:
1) What ADSL providers are available in your postal area?
2) What's your monthly budget?
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
If you don't want to run cable, you could always set up a wireless LAN, though it may not be as fast.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Charles Capps
We appreciate your concern. It is noted and stupid.
Member # 9
posted
The slowest wireless technology is 11 megabits... the most you can get out of DSL is 6 (if you can afford it). Cable maxes out at 3.
Slowness in wireless-land will only become apparent if you do lots of file transfers between the machines.
Wireless is not really all that cheap for three PCs... an access point will be around $100. Then you'll need access cards for each machine, each being around $75. They make USB devices that connect you to the wireless network as well, but those are more expensive. Also available are cards for laptops.
(I'm going wireless at home for the new laptop. Nothing like sitting on the couch and watching TV while surfing the net..)
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
ADSL has a technical maximum of 8 megabits down and 1 megabit up, which really ought to be enough for anybody but often isn't. *cough* Cable can pump much, MUCH more data through, but even the fastest subscription types are typically capped at around 4 megabits down and 2 megabits up since bandwith is still an expensive commodity these days, though it really ought to be a lot cheaper. *cough* Either way, as Charles says, the 11 mbit/sec transfer rate of a wireless LAN is not going to be a problem until you start shuffling porn movies back and forth across your network, so if you can afford the steeper initial cost, go for it. B)
-------------------- ".mirrorS arE morE fuN thaN televisioN" - TEH PNIK FLAMIGNO
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Yay, Broadband still sucks in Los Angeles. At least I can use it to get a lot of sex and Star Trek.
On a more technical issue, I just bought the Microsoft Wireless Router (MN-700) but I'm having one hell of a time trying to set up the wireless network. I don't know what the hell I'm doing wrong other than not buying Linksys this time around.
-------------------- "It speaks to some basic human needs: that there is a tomorrow, it's not all going to be over with a big splash and a bomb, that the human race is improving, that we have things to be proud of as humans." -Gene Roddenberry about Star Trek
Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged
"The slowest wireless technology is 11 megabits... the most you can get out of DSL is 6 (if you can afford it). Cable maxes out at 3."
In theory, sure. But, in practice, if the signal from the router doesn't penetrate well to parts of your house, you're going to end up slower there. We've got the router in our family room on the first floor, and, as soon as you walk up to the second floor, the signal level drops radically.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Wireless is not really all that cheap for three PCs... an access point will be around $100. Then you'll need access cards for each machine, each being around $75. They make USB devices that connect you to the wireless network as well, but those are more expensive. Also available are cards for laptops.
I got a rather good wireless router on sale for $20, and have seen PC cards for as low as $10, and USB for $15. Watch www.techbargains.com and wait for the right sales.
-------------------- "This is why you people think I'm so unknowable. You don't listen!" - God, "God, the Devil and Bob"
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Thanks for all your replies - I am overwhelmed by the technicalities of it all!
quote:Originally posted by Cartman: Installing a network to share an internet connection is child's play, but let's not get ahead of ourselves just yet. Two questions:
1) What ADSL providers are available in your postal area?
2) What's your monthly budget?
1) Can't I just plug an ADSL modem in on my existing provider and just get extra speed?
2) a) same as it is now if I can just plug one into what I have or
b) nothing as we I don't want to incur any extra costs. If it costs more money and hastle then I'll grit my teeth and bare it out until I get a place of my own!
c) BT Broadband is at �29.99 and can do the network thing for the PCs. Might twist my parent's arms!
-------------------- If you cant convince them, confuse them.
Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
"Can't I just plug an ADSL modem in on my existing provider and just get extra speed?"
Certainly not. For one thing, unless it's somehow different there, they have to add little connector devices (some sort of filter, I think) to all of your telephone cables. Plus, and this addresses your second point(s), DSL service costs more than dial-up. Surely you didn't think they'd give you all that extra bandwidth for free?
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
1) Can't I just plug an ADSL modem in on my existing provider and just get extra speed?
Erh, no. ADSL is a service, like digital or satellite TV, that may or may not be deliverable in your area. And, as with all public services, there are good ones, bad ones, fast ones, slow ones, cheap ones, expensive ones, but (you thought there wasn't a "but"?) unfortunately no free ones. Which is why, before you subscribe to one and get yourself in a messy legal bind, you should carefully compare ALL the providers that can deliver an ADSL service to you by reading their fine print and studying their connection offers (speeds, monthly fees, installation costs, modem prices, data limits, extras, those sorts of things). When you've done that, you'll know if 2c is a good deal or not.
2) a) same as it is now if I can just plug one into what I have or
b) nothing as we I don't want to incur any extra costs. If it costs more money and hastle then I'll grit my teeth and bare it out until I get a place of my own!
posted
Most sorts of broadband are geered towards a single modem for the main house computer. Any other computers are going to require networking.
If you want a cheap broadband option (and you like in the UK, don't you?), look at NTL. The speed is only 150k/s for the slowest option, but it's really cheap. In that, it's probably cheaper than the combined total you're paying for your current ISP and phone line.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Well, on a good note my parents are now considering getting BT Yahoo! Broadband for the home and getting their tech guys to come in and set-up the network for us - provided we can all access the Net at the same time (can we?).
-------------------- If you cant convince them, confuse them.
Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
Yes dear, you can.
-------------------- ".mirrorS arE morE fuN thaN televisioN" - TEH PNIK FLAMIGNO
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged