I looked earlier and the "first image from Titan" was a different picture. They probably took it down because you could see the Crystal City in it.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Albeit unprocessed and small and grainy and probably only useful if you use spectrometers for a living, but check it totally out anyway.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
There have been curious bandwidth problems, and some sites have in fact pulled pictures - including the most interesting one to date, apparently showing a Titan landscape complete with liquid-eroded rocks, boulders and ice. Looks like the ESA wasn't as ready as JPL was last year when the rovers hit Mars - they'll be working overtime this weekend getting some great new images to us.
What's really amazing to me is that the features everyone was looking so hard to find on Mars - water erosion, hydrographic evidence, etc. - is present in spades on Titan. There are valleys, channels, and apparently shorelines. As a professional geographer, I'm thoroughly fascinated by this REMOTE remote sensing, as we can say in this industry.
I'm really interested in the third picture, which shows the view from 8km up. I didn't know what I was looking at until I turned my head sideways - those are NOT mountains, but the variety of landscapes on this tiny moon is seriously cool.
posted
As long as it doesn't crap on my car, it's cool.
Man, even after all the politics and frustration of a very limited space exploration, something like this comes along and makes me a believer again.
Just think of all we could accomplish in future years by sending this same kind of probe to the other moons in our solar syatem: I really want to see proof of a liquid ocean on (under the ice technically) Europa in my lifetime.
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
My only real annoyance with Huygens so far is ESA's policy on information release. Unlike NASA/JPL, which basically releases everything to the public as soon as they get it into a manageable format, ESA prefers to hold everything close, process it, let their guys analyze it first, and THEN let the public and the other eggheads have their turn. It's a selfishness borne of the simple fact that they have fifteen member states and the politics and bureaucracy involved trickles down even to the base release levels seen here. This is why, while JPL was on the recieving end, everything got sent straight to ESA and they got rather angry when someone at JPL posted an image before they got the go-ahead. We'll get the data eventually, but until then we're stuck with waiting for the choice images and data to be released first. I wonder if the best images are yet to come or not.
OTOH, the ESA bureaucracy has already revealed a problem, as a poorly-worded or confusing set of instructions to the JPL guys caused some data transfer protocols on Cassini to be improperly configured, resulting in some of the Huygens data to be lost. They're trying to piece together what they lost from tiny bits of data captured directly at recieving stations around the world, but I understand there are few real hopes. While I too was hoping that this mistake wasn't made, it serves to demonstrate just how differently ESA and NASA operate.
posted
That's going up on my wall. Niiiice image...any idea as to the altitude that was taken at?
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
