posted
Not that's been demonstrated, beyond the normal human range.
-------------------- "This is why you people think I'm so unknowable. You don't listen!" - God, "God, the Devil and Bob"
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
God almighty, change the record, you little twerp. "Miss the point, miss the point, miss the point. . ." You're the one who brought up the World Trade Centre, despite it having nothing whatsoever to do with the topic under discussion, which is Saddam Hussein. I imagine your "point" (you're sure fond of those) is that people who are irrational and dangerous - by your standards ar all the same, and should be dealt with the same.
Which brings us, once again, to your standards, as referenced by the "normal human range" you mention. Said normal human range being that occupied by white, Christian, Republican, heterosexual, and (no doubt) male citizens of the United States of America.
"I'm not a great fan of Saddam and am generally in favour of taking him out before he does anything unwise..."
The president of the US is actively promoting invading a foreign country w/o provocation, and it's Hussein people are worrying about?
Good point; maybe we should try and get Bush to challenge Saddam to single combat. and then nuke the arena. Two birds with one stone.
-------------------- "I am an almost extinct breed, an old-fashioned gentleman, which means I can be a cast-iron son-of-a-bitch when it suits me." --Jubal Harshaw
Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
I was telling my roommate the other day about how we should take Bush, Blair, and Hussein, lock them in a room, and let them fight to the death. After that, whoever's left...
And then we both said "gas them" at the same time. It was eerie.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
After watching another report today, where the reponses went
US: They're lying! Kill them!
and
UK: They might be lying! We might kill them!
...I've been trying to figure our government out. Blair has pretty much been "I agree with Bush, but...". He's the one who kept trying to get him to go to the UN, rather than just charging in.
I do wonder that if perhaps Blair had taken the same position as Russia etc in the "The US is wrong", the US might have not even bothered with the UN and just charged in.
How much of Blair is him saying what he thinks, and how much is him trying to keep the US from going crazy? My opinions about Blair jump all over the place, so I'm not sure. Even if he is saying exactly what he thinks, I still say there's a fair chance that he's kept us out of war so far.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
