Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » The Flameboard » Who's PAYING this guy?

   
Author Topic: Who's PAYING this guy?
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Exactly what kind of game is Blix playing here?
Why leave out information this pertinent from your public speech?

http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/03/11/wblix11.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/03/11/ixnewstop.html

quote:
British and American officials were furious that Mr Blix had failed to mention Iraq's "Project 101" when he addressed the Security Council last Friday.

Details of the scheme suggested Iraq had sought to produce cluster munitions filled with biological and chemical agents to be scattered across battlefields. The project was referred to in the detail of the inspector's written report. The hollow metal balls, and fuses Iraq is known to possess, were ideally suited for dispersing agents across large areas, a US official told the New York Times.

"When these things come out from the main frame and they explode inward, chemical agents come out," he said. "These can be used for biological weapons too."

quote:

"Unmovic has credible information that the total quantity of BW [biological warfare] agents in bombs, warheads and in bulk at the time of the Gulf war was 7,000 litres more than declared," the report said. It dismisses Iraq's claims to have destroyed its stocks of the agent 10 years ago.

http://www.washtimes.com/national/default-20033111737.htm

quote:
The report also says Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein continues to deceive inspectors about the fate of chemical and biological weapons, including deadly anthrax.

quote:
"He managed not to mention a new missile type, and a drone, which are clear smoking guns, and he ignored pages of evidence with dozens of examples of Iraqi noncompliance in every facet of their [weapons of mass destruction] programs."

quote:
"The single most devastating discovery that the inspectors have come across was omitted from Blix's verbal discussion at the U.N.," said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Buster Glosson, who designed the Operation Desert Storm air war during the 1991 Persian Gulf campaign and has written a book, "War with Iraq: Critical Lessons."
"They hid it in the back pages of their report, that being the drones and bombs that have the capacity of dispensing biological and chemical weapons."
On the drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles, the written report said, "Recent inspections have also revealed the existence of a drone with a wingspan of 7.45 [meters] that has not been declared by Iraq."
Iraq contends its L-29 drone can travel only 30 miles. But Unmovic says the system can fly more than 95 miles, in violation of U.N. resolutions, and is designed to carry tanks that can spray biological and chemical weapons.

quote:
On the cluster munition, the written report said that video at a test center, Haidar Farms, "shows ... personnel conducting tests of a cluster bomb that appears to utilize submunitions based, in part, on 122-mm warhead components.
"Iraq has been vague as to exactly how many field tests with 122-mm rocket warheads occurred and the number of warheads involved," the report says. It also disputes Iraqi assertions, such as the following:
* It destroyed thousands of gallons of anthrax.
Baghdad did not return biological agents to their home facilities after deploying them in the 1991 war.
"It ... seems highly probable that the destruction of bulk agent, including anthrax, stated by Iraq to be at Al Hakam in July/August 1991, did not occur," the report says. "Based on all the available evidence, the strong presumption is that about 10,000 liters of anthrax was not destroyed and may still exist."
* It destroyed 15 biological warheads. The report says Iraq's assertions conflicted with physical evidence collected at the supposed destruction site.
"This suggests that some special warheads were retained for a period and, if so, it would be logical to assume that some missiles and associated propellant might also have been retained," the report states.



--------------------
"The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
He did report it in his written report, though, didn't he? And that report was given to all Council members, right?

I haven't really followed this story, so I could be wrong...

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
True, but given that most of the public is not privy to the written reports, but could see the oral report on CNN or a similar format, it's important from a PR standpoint. Basically, Blix is allowing the public to continue with its mistaken assumptions about the quality of Iraq's "cooperation" and the search for it's WMD's. I still encounter people who INSIST that Iraq has no chemical weapons.

--------------------
"The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It seems to me that the most important stuff would go first -- i.e. violations of the UN regulations. I don't know much about exactly what Blix talked about in his actual speech, but when you've got THIS MUCH evidence piling up, even if it's not all conclusive on its own, it's pretty damn convincing.

It could be that Blix (and others in the UN, like France) wanted this info to come out slowly so they can do a reasonable graceful about-face in their policy.

But at the same time, suppressing this kind of material almost qualifies as assisting the Iraqi deceptions. What can really be gained by delaying the revelation of this kind of info? Aside from making it less and less likely that a US invasion can be launched before next fall, that is... (Which is probably what the French and maybe Blix want -- although Blix shouldn't really be the one to make those decisions, IMO.)

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3