Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » The Flameboard » I told you so, so why aren't we dealing with it? (Page 2)

  This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4   
Author Topic: I told you so, so why aren't we dealing with it?
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Kim Jong II:
"The override!...WHERE's THE OVERRIDE!?!"


Though the thought of Bush in control of North Korea as well is pretty sobering.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's "IL", not "II".
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yeah....

I just call him Kim.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Saltah'na
Chinese Canadian, or 75% Commie Bastard.
Member # 33

 - posted      Profile for Saltah'na     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Consistency..... Bush lacks Consistency.....

--------------------
"And slowly, you come to realize, it's all as it should be, you can only do so much. If you're game enough, you could place your trust in me. For the love of life, there's a tradeoff, we could lose it all but we'll go down fighting...." - David Sylvian
FreeSpace 2, the greatest space sim of all time, now remastered!

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
George W. Bush: the overwatery oatmeal of world politics.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
But....Bush is consistanat.

He's consistantly gone after easier targets than those that pose a real treat to the US.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Grokca:
Why Bushco decided to stop the direct talks and go to this strange arrangement where they will only talk to NK through the other countries, I'll never know.

Let's see... Perhaps it's becaues the US was in direct negotiations with the DPRK for the past ten years, and they consistently lied through their teeth to us about their nuclear program? The whole point of the negotiations back in 1994 was to stop the North Koreans from building their nuclear reactor, and subsequently, nuclear weapons.

And what did they do? They took the foreign aid package, got help in building a second nuclear reactor, and continued working on their nukes.

For once, I think that the multilateral talks with North Korea are one of the few things that the Bush administration has done even remotely right in the area of international diplomacy. They certainly should've been a lot more discreet and tactful (*cough*AXISOFEVIL*cough*) but IMO it's much more important to get the other nations of the region directly involved in the talks to get them all to come down on the North Koreans the next time they start acting up after this.

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Also consider the anxiety of all the neighboring countries if they're shut out of disarmament talks with a country with nuclear weapons and a nutty leader.

Japan is not pulling any punches: today they gave NK an untimatum- North Korea resumes talks or Japan passes a law banning all North Korean ships from Japan's harbors.

No trade with japan would cost NK a heck of a lot, I'd imagine.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Neutrino 123
Member
Member # 1327

 - posted      Profile for Neutrino 123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Right, about one quarter of North Korea's exports go to Japan, so they'll definatly notice even though NK doesn't have much trade total.

It's nice to finally see some economic pressure being put on North Korea. This should have been done over a year ago, and even now a more unified stance from China, South Korea, and the U.S. would be helpful. This would be much more decisive then Japan acting alone.

--------------------
Neutrino 123 (pronounced Neutrino One-Two-Three)

Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The US adding economic pressure would only strengthen Kim's idea that the US is out to get him.

Japan acting without US involvment sets a leadership example to the other countries in the region.
Mabye the NK's local trading partners will economicaly strangle Kim into real negotiations.

It'd be nice to see UN economic sanctions though. (not real likely- everyone treats NK like someone holding a live grenade- with good reason.)
North Korea wants a biiig foreign aid package from the US to stop it's nuclear programs. That's why they ant "direct" talks that exclude the six member nations. Can you see any NATO country sending millions (or moore) of dollars to a dictatorship on their word not to continue making bombs?

That would certainly send the wrong message to Iran....and NK is watching how we handle Iran for clues how to deal with the US.
Quite the circle, eh?

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Quite simply, the reason Bush will never go into unilateral talks with North Korea is because, during the campaign, Kerry said we should.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Jason Abbadon:
Japan acting without US involvment sets a leadership example to the other countries in the region.
Mabye the NK's local trading partners will economicaly strangle Kim into real negotiations.

Heh, I wish. Probably those wacky North Koreans will just start screaming that Japan is just a puppet of the United States. Remember, logic is something that is nearly completely absent from North Korean diplomacy...
quote:
North Korea wants a biiig foreign aid package from the US to stop it's nuclear programs. That's why they ant "direct" talks that exclude the six member nations. Can you see any NATO country sending millions (or moore) of dollars to a dictatorship on their word not to continue making bombs?
Especially since that's exactly what happened the last time. The US signed a deal with the DPRK, in which they agreed to halt their nuclear weapons programs and shut down their heavy water nuclear reactor. In exchange, the US agreed to help them build a light-water reactor (in which the reactor's byproducts can't be used to help make nuclear weapons), and give them a great big aid package (food, mostly). And instead, the North Koreans took the aid package, got help building the new reactor, and kept working on their nukes.

Would you try to make a deal with someone like that again? I believe the proper saying is, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Veers
You first
Member # 661

 - posted      Profile for Veers         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by MinutiaeMan:
Would you try to make a deal with someone like that again? I believe the proper saying is, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."

Not according to the president.

--------------------
Meh

Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I believe the phrase was "Fool me once, shame on... shame on me... fool me... won't get fooled again."
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Grokca
Senior Member
Member # 722

 - posted      Profile for Grokca     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
For once, I think that the multilateral talks with North Korea are one of the few things that the Bush administration has done even remotely right in the area of international diplomacy.
Yes, it sure seems to have worked really well. Can't argue with results.

--------------------
"and none of your usual boobery."
M. Burns

Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3