posted
So, er, George Galloway had a pretty vitriolic rebuttal to the senate commitee's allegations of improprieties in the oil-for-food abuses. You can read an article. Or here's the first bits:
quote:WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A maverick British lawmaker angrily rejected on Tuesday as "utterly preposterous" charges by the U.S. Congress that he profited from the Iraq oil-for-food program and used the hearing as a platform to attack the U.S.-led invasion.
Far from showing the usual deference of witnesses before Congress, British MP George Galloway defiantly told a Senate committee its evidence against him was false, condemned the investigation and demanded to know why it had not questioned him first before making the allegations.
The east London Member of Parliament appeared before the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which is examining how Saddam used oil to reward politicians, particularly from Russia, France and Britain, under the U.N.'s oil-for-food program. As the sharp exchange unfolded, the mood in the packed room was electric with occasional snickers from the audience at Galloway's jibes at the senators.
Galloway bluntly confronted the Republican chairman of the committee, Sen. Norm Coleman of Minnesota, and challenged the attorney to back up claims the British MP profited handsomely from the now defunct program. Some of his harshest remarks concerned Coleman's support for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq that ousted President Saddam Hussein.
"Now I know that standards have slipped over the last few years in Washington, but for a lawyer, you are remarkably cavalier with any idea of justice," Galloway said.
If you're interested in watching video of his testimony (under oath, mind you) go here. The section with Gorgeous George is about 2 hours into the Real Player file linked to towards the bottom of that page. It's really pretty awesome.
Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
It was absolutely fantastic. Galloway is certainly crooked in some form or other, but it was a great performance from him all the same. The cracks about Rumsfeld meeting Saddam, and Coleman's own campaign contributors, were brilliant. No wonder only two members of the subcommittee stayed around to hear his testimony.
Of course, it's all a sideshow really. The main targets of this investigation are Russian and French officials involved in the Oil For Food programme, as well as the UN in general and Kofi Annan in particular. It's just sanctioned UN-bashing. Bit odd that one of the opening broadsides in the campaign would be to accuse Gorgeous George of - surreally - giving money TO Iraq!
(I also saw a bit of Fox News' coverage of the hearing, they seemed determined to report as little of what Galloway actually said and just pass it off to ranting on his behalf!)
posted
I cant imagine this actually reaching Kofi Annan directly- though it happened on his watch, he's said he wont consider stepping down over this.
I'm actually suprised that this investigation has gotten to this stage at all- it moved with glacial slowness for months.
Good show though on Galloway's part- good use of "utterly preposterous". I dont think I've ever heard anyone actually say that aloud.
I really wish I'd seen Fox's "coverage" of this. It must not have been nore than a recap with no video footage.
I dont know how they plan on "going after" the Russian and French suspects- at best the investigation will show that Saddam used money to bribe those officials into opposing the US's (flimsy) case for invasion.
It'd be a laugh if they call Saddam to testify- what would he say?
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
The bit where Coleman mentions that Galloway has met Saddam Hussein, and George ripostes that he's met Saddam the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld - twice, and he at least was there to discuss humanitarian matters while Rumsfeld was there to sell guns, and maps to target those guns.
posted
Oh, that. I don't know how much coverage it's actually getting, but I wouldn't have expected any, anyway, knowing what our media are like.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Our local big paper (the St. Louis Post-Dispatch) is often accused (by conservatives, I'm sure) of being too liberal. So, of course, when Rick Santorum, on the Senate floor, compared Democrats to Hitler, the headline was "Both Sides Invoke Racial Politics in Fight over Filibuster in Senate".
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Here. Brighten your day.
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
Senate debates should be governed by Godwin's Law, and whoever breaks it dragged outside and shot. Most aren't that long anyway.
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
How about basing them on Occam's Razor instead to expidite things?
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged