I just don't understand this lawsuit. McDonalds clearly had no knowledge or had ANY part of the fraud mentioned.
-------------------- "And slowly, you come to realize, it's all as it should be, you can only do so much. If you're game enough, you could place your trust in me. For the love of life, there's a tradeoff, we could lose it all but we'll go down fighting...." - David Sylvian FreeSpace 2, the greatest space sim of all time, now remastered!
#1. He's a lawyer. #2. He's from Chicago. #3. We live in the most litigous society in history, where even a frivolous lawsuit can net some idiot millions (of which the lawyer gets 30%.)
-------------------- "The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword
posted
Actually, since McDonald's knew about the fraud for at least the past year, and knew that their last games were being rigged (which they and the Justice Department used to nail those responsible), one could very easily make the case that McD's very well knew that their games were rigged ...
Clearly Simon Marketing should be the defendant in the case and not the Big Mac.
-------------------- Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war. ~ohn Adams
Once again the Bush Administration is worse than I had imagined, even though I thought I had already taken account of the fact that the Bush administration is invariably worse than I can imagine. ~Brad DeLong
You're just babbling incoherently. ~C. Montgomery Burns
posted
'Course McDonald's should turn around a sue the criminals, thereby getting their money back. Then everyone's happy.
The thing I really don't understand is the arguement that people went to McDonald's more often and bought super-size fries instead of regular, and so on. If this behavior cost anyone so much extra money that it's worth suing over, they're probably already dead of a heart attack from eating so much McDonald's food.
posted
When I was working at Blockbuster (many years ago during High School), the rental fee was raised a penny.
Why?
Because a lawyer thought the tax was too high on the video rentals, and threatened to sue. Blockbuster did some checking, and realized they were rounding the tax down a penny, when they should've been rounding up.
Of course, that could just've been the story they were feeding everyone to keep people from getting too upset.
posted
While I would agree that this particular case doesn't appear to be McDonald's fault, I'm not at all sure I see why they should be automatically exempt. This was their contest, after all. They hired the company they did. They still have some responsibility. Don't you remember Star Trek VI?
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Saltah'na
Chinese Canadian, or 75% Commie Bastard.
Member # 33
posted
Kirk's ship, Kirk's mission, and Kirk's crew.
McD's is having a new contest give away about $10 Mil in prizes. I think this was their plan in order to find a way to nail the culprits and apologize to the customers.
So they feel a measure of regret and are providing compensation. What more do you want, beat their heads down with a crowbar?
And besides, in a case like this, you do not want to let their culprits know they've been watched. Course McD's knew. The FBI told then while they were holding a contest. They wanted to flush out the culprit, not scare them away.
Sue Simon Marketing. They're the real culprit.
-------------------- "And slowly, you come to realize, it's all as it should be, you can only do so much. If you're game enough, you could place your trust in me. For the love of life, there's a tradeoff, we could lose it all but we'll go down fighting...." - David Sylvian FreeSpace 2, the greatest space sim of all time, now remastered!
posted
To clarify, if I recall correctly, the FBI made their case to McDonald's last year, and requested that they hold another contest this year to catch the bad guys, as Tahna said.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged