posted
Haven't you heard the expression before? Characters who are believable, who evolve during the series, and give you the impression they are of flesh and bone, not just flat images on a TV screen who lack any development and for whom you don't really care?
Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
posted
Well, that's the diference between one-dimensional and multi-dimensional characters. I was just wondering why they should have three dimensions, specifically.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Not to get dragged into a Nixpicking argument, but doesn't "3-dimensional" mean, in this context, that the characters are "life-like"? Because people in real life have 3 dimensions, and so on...
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Well, I just don't think I've ever heard a multi-dimensional character's number of dimensions specified before. I was under the impression that a one-dimensional character was one that only had a single element to his/her/its character. For example, your typical bad guy whose one dimension is "he's evil". A more fleshed-out character would have more dimensions, but not an exact number.
I never thought it was used in terms of "flat" and "not flat" characters, since that would make the flat characters "two-dimensional", and I've never heard that used.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Were you really nine years old when you joined Flare?
-------------------- Picard: Mr. Crusher, what's our maximum speed this week? Wesley: [checking manual] Uh, 9.4, sir. Picard: Very good. Take us to Warp 9.8 then. Wesley: Aye, sir. Warp 9.2 it is.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Printer-friendly view of this topic
