Flare Sci-Fi Forums: Date of FC / Second Borg Invasion

my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

»	Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » General Trek » Date of FC / Second Borg Invasion (Page 2)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Author

Topic: Date of FC / Second Borg Invasion

Wes
Over 20 years here? Holy cow.
Member # 212

posted

"The Enterprise-E has been in space for over a year now"

The Ent-E was launched late 2371, so im assuming First Contact took place in 2372 (until they went back to 2063)

------------------
Wes Button � [email protected]
TechFX Studios � The United Federation Uplink �
------------------
Janeway: "Dimissed"
Neelix: [stands there dumbfounded] "b..but.."
Janeway: "That's Starfleet for get out"

Registered: Aug 1999 | IP: Logged

Spike
Pathetic Vampire
Member # 322

posted

No, the E-E was launched at stardate 49827.5. That's late 2372.

------------------
"Second star to the right, and then straight on till morning."

[This message has been edited by Fitz (edited February 16, 2001).]

Registered: Mar 2000 | IP: Logged

Michael Dracon
aka: NightWing or Altair
Member # 4

posted

And they said the ship was out "for almost a year now". So that means they're in late 2373...

------------------
Terry: "Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, ...."
Max: "And?"
Terry: "I forgot."
Max: "Come on, Clinton was the fun one, then came the boring one."
Terry: "They're all boring."

- Batman Beyond (aka: Batman of the Future)

[This message has been edited by Altair (edited February 16, 2001).]

Registered: Mar 1999 | IP: Logged

Wes
Over 20 years here? Holy cow.
Member # 212

posted

I don't know what the hell I was doing when I made that post. I have the cuttaway on my wall, and even it says October 2372.

So FC was in 2373.

Registered: Aug 1999 | IP: Logged

Lee
I'm a spy now. Spies are cool.
Member # 393

posted

So because her underwear wasn't dry yet, she actually went commando for most of that ep? 8)

------------------
"I rather strongly disagree, even if I share the love of Dick. Speaking of which, that would be the most embarrasing .sig quote ever, so never use it."

- Simon Sizer, 23/01/2001

Registered: Jul 2000 | IP: Logged

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Printer-friendly view of this topic