posted
I trust IMDB about as far as I can throw its server. It's notoriously inaccurate, and mistakes often take months to fix. Like this one, which was probably submitted by a reader who saw the Judd interview.
quote:I spoke with my manager, and he made some calls about Trek X. The word is that it's too early to know if I'm out or not, and it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to cut my scene, so this may turn out to be a Stupid Internet Rumor(tm). I am grateful that I have good people working for/with me, who care about my career as much as I do.
-------------------- "Never give up. And never, under any circumstances, no matter what - never face the facts." - Ruth Gordon
Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
I've submitted to IMDb for some time now, so I know exactly how accurate (and inaacurate) a source of info it can be. I personally sent in a delete command for Judd last week, but these things take time. Looks like someone jumped the gun on the original rumour.
[ April 26, 2002, 15:26: Message edited by: The_Tom ]
-------------------- "I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
So who will be in the film other than the senior staff? Will Troi's mother be there?
-------------------- "It speaks to some basic human needs: that there is a tomorrow, it's not all going to be over with a big splash and a bomb, that the human race is improving, that we have things to be proud of as humans." -Gene Roddenberry about Star Trek
Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Confirmed through official channels have been the Magnificent Seven, plus two main baddies in the form of Tom Hardy (Shinzon) and Ron Perlman (Viceroy). Also confirmed officially have been brief appearances of Wheaton, Goldberg and Mulgrew, and supporting roles held by Dina Meyer (Donatra) and Steven Culp (Madden). Stewart's confirmed in interviews that X-Men director Brian Singer appears as a bridge officer on the Ent-E and actually has speaking lines, so it isn't by the conventional definition a true cameo. Lanier ("Young Ensign") was added to the IMDb out-of-the-blue several months ago and I understand that there a role of that exact name in the film, so in all likelihood this info came from him or his agent and is accurate.
[ April 26, 2002, 21:26: Message edited by: The_Tom ]
-------------------- "I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
FUCK! No Lwaxana!?! It's her DAUGHTER'S WEDDING!!! The one thing she has been HARPING about for years and years. I hope they give a reason why... like maybe Dominion Negotiations - or she's still trying to fix what happened (occupation) to Betazed!?!
Bugger Bugger Bugger... A few line wouldn't have hurt. Will Deanna be going BTW, I assume this won't be a TRADITIONAL Betazoid wedding?
I thought I read where Lwaxana and Mr. Homm would be attending.
*tsk*
-------------------- "Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)
-------------------- "I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Well, the thread title says there are "casting" spoilers, so I guess I should point out that the spoilers I'm about to give are actual plot spoilers.
Anyway, IIRC, the reason Lwaxana Troi isn't seen at the wedding is because the wedding isn't seen, just the reception. Either that, or there are two weddings, one on Earth and one on Betazed, and we only see part of the Earth one. I remember hearing both things, but I don't recall which one was in the supposed script, and which was just a pure rumor.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
They're having the reception on Earth and they were on their way to Betazed to have the naked wedding ceremony with Lwaxana when they get...sidetracked. (I won't go into further detail about how they get sidetracked... )
-MMoM
-------------------- The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.
Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
garamet
Ex-Member
posted
The Real Life reason is that Majel's just too expensive. Not to mention she'd never be content with "just a few lines."
IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by garamet: The Real Life reason is that Majel's just too expensive.
She most certainly is not.
-------------------- "I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged