posted
Well early spoliers have suggested at least one new ships design. Of course there is the chance that that was for the Romulans.
Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Well, there is some information on ships for Star Trek X. Hell, there's a lot of information on Star Trek X considering a script review was posted at AICN last week.
However, I would like to say that ANY information regarding the new Trek movie needs to have spoiler warnings posted in the subject field and in any posts that may contain spoilers. If you need to know what I'm talking about, see The_Tom's recent thread on spoilers in the Incoming Hail forum.
I'm just bringing this up here and now because this thread is going to attract someone who knows something and is going to post something about the Enterprise-G being destroyed by Kazon battleships or something (please note, I'm making this up). Then the Spoiler God is going to come in here and start kicking ass.
So just play it safe with spoilers: when in doubt, don't leave the warnings out.
posted
I bet there will be a few new starfleet ships, and a hell of a lot more Romulan ships. Something tells me theres gonna me some major battles going on.
Registered: Aug 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
*SPOILER WARNING* Do not read beyond this point unless you wish to be potentially spoiled for Trek X. *SPOILER WARNING* S S S S S S S S S S S S S S According to rumors, the Shinzon character will have a new warbird twice the size of the Ent-E. Hmm. You'd think that the Romulans would have learned something from the Dominion war...don't built bigger, lunkier ships that make better targets. Build smaller, faster ships that can do more damage.
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
Siegfried: There already are spoiler warnings. See the words "Trek X" in the thread title? Anyone stupid enough to read a thread about ST10 when they don't want to read spoilers about ST10 deserves to be spoiled.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
So it is impossible to talk about the next movie without revealing plot details from it? A thread titled, oh, "What kind of things would you like to see in Trek X" instantly becomes a pro-spoiler zone, even though that isn't the intention of the person who started it?
Nonsense.
(Grumble grumble, silly internet formatting, grumble)
posted
I'm not saying that all threads with Trek X in the title are going to become spoiler zones, but even the threads like "What do you want to see in Trek X" face the possibility of someone coming in and posting spoilers. That thread and this thread do not need spoiler warnings, in my opinion. But if someone who does know something comes in, he/she may mistakenly post information about Trek X. Then the humble people who were simply discussing their ideas get smacked upside the head with real information.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
If the introduce one more friggin Fed shuttle....
We already have: Type 6 (TNG) Type 7 (TNG) Type 8 (VOY) Type 9 (VOY) Type 9A (from TNG TM) Type 10 (from DS9 TM) Type 11 (ST:FC-the Sovy Shuttle) ...and a bunch of different Shuttlepods.
Why in hell would the Feds need a new shuttle design? I HATED it in FC when they introduced that stupid new shuttle...IMO, the Type 6 made the most sense, and the rest are just plain silly.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
