posted
I was actually planning to put up a page similar to what Frank suggested, presenting all imfamous problems like the Defiant size. I think Frank will be faster, though. The page setup could look like this: - Problem: The starship **** [image link] is supposed to be ****, however, this is in contradiction to ****. - Evidence: [heavy quoting, images] - Solution #1: [description]. This is supported by the individuals a [external link], b, and c. - Solution #2: ... supported by d and e. - Personal solution: ...
There could be several links to my own pages as well as to other websites with different arguments, after all we're not working against each other.
Frank and The_Tom have already given a number of good suggestions. Maybe we should open some threads each of which discusses exactly one of the problems or all of them in a questionnaire. We should try not to throw in anything else this time, so it can serve as a basis for Frank's (or another individual's) web page.
posted
Well, in many cases, we don't necessarily want a solution, just an explanation of the problem. It really depends on the issue, though.
------------------ http://frankg.dgne.com/ Ultra Magnus: "I know you're bored, Rodimus, but with the mantle of leadership comes obligations." Rodimus Prime: "I don't suppose I could interest you in a used mantle?"
posted
Exactly - that's what needs to be explained.
------------------ http://frankg.dgne.com/ Ultra Magnus: "I know you're bored, Rodimus, but with the mantle of leadership comes obligations." Rodimus Prime: "I don't suppose I could interest you in a used mantle?"
posted
How about is the USS Nash registry a valid registry? I seem to recall that debate just not to long ago.
(I may be repeating some)
Do all class ships still have NX registries?
Conflicting on screen references? (I know there is a reference from Second Chances but I don't have my notes here).
Does use of FASA material or Franz Joseph material or Shane Johnson material validate the information that was used onscreen, or listed elsewhere in the book?
Do refrences to Animated Series validate information from that source?
I'll post more when I bring my ship list tommorrow to look over while posting.
------------------ -=/\=- Captain Stark http://beam.to/readyroom
"The man on the top walks a lonely path. The chain of command is often a noose." Dr. Leonard McCoy --Obsession, Stardate: 3619.2
posted
Just off the top of my head: Theories behind how Starfleet assigns registries, in particular why the Prometheus has such a low one. Another would be to compile a list of ships that have more than one registry like the Ahwahnee.
posted
Speaking of registries, we should also talk about the low-registry ships like the Akira that still appear to be new. (After all, the Phoenix, NCC-65420, was definitively commissioned right before the Enterprise...
------------------ http://frankg.dgne.com/ Rodimus Prime: "No more jokes, Springer. Cybertron's in deadly danger. We're heading back there. Now." Springer: "Yes sir, Mister Leader, sir."
posted
Rather impossible, actually. Examples to contradict: USS Defiant NX-74205, built at Antares USS Voyager NCC-74656, built at Earth Station McKinley USS Enterprise NCC-1701-E, built at San Francisco
The same would probably go for all the other ships from 3xxxx and up, for all ships for that matter
------------------ "The one, the only, THE 359!"
[This message was edited by The359 on April 27, 1999.]
Printer-friendly view of this topic
