Topic: What's the name of the Nebula in Sisko's office?
Amasov Prime
lensfare-induced epileptic shock
Member # 742
posted
If the model is the second Melbourne built by Miarecki for BoBW and later used in 'Future Imperfect' in Riker's room, just modified with some triangular pod to resemble the standard-Nebula from the show, it could have been equipped with another name. They even relabeled the space shuttle docked at the ISS with the name 'Enterprise'. On the other hand, if it is the old Melbourne-model, it could still be the starship Melbourne. Does anyone know what's the name of the ship?
-------------------- "This is great. Usually it's just cardboard walls in a garage."
Registered: Nov 2001
| IP: Logged
Shik
Starship database: completed; History of Starfleet: done; website: probably never
Member # 343
posted
Paul Robeson. No? How about Frank Belson? Don't like that? Robert Urich? How about Kunta Kinte?
Remember when Sisko was supposed to collect African artifacts & stuff for, like, 2 episodes?
-------------------- "The French have a saying: 'mise en place'—keep everything in its fucking place!"
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
Or, in other words, who gives a shit? Christ, why look elsewhere for examples of extreme fanboy behaviour when we have this kind of bollocks creeping in under the radar?
posted
Considering that the Yes-It's-Obviously-The-Stargazer-And-If-You-Think-Otherwise-Then-You-Fancy-Your-Mum model in Picard's ready room was lablled NCC-7100 for 7 years, I don't hold out any hope that they bothered with a model we saw for roughly 4 minutes.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I think it's probably the Melbourne. It makes sense for him to have another ship from Wolf 359 along with the Saratoga.
BTW, why does everyone get all snippety when someone asks something obscure? Obviously, I know that nobody here knows the answer, and there might not even be an answer, but there's no harm in asking. Don't chew him out.
It's the same thing with when I suggested we find out what the "Centaur" was originally called. There are some of us who care about this stuff, as strange as it seems...
-MMoM
[ April 25, 2002, 08:03: Message edited by: The Mighty Monkey of Mim ]
-------------------- The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.
Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
Amasov Prime
lensfare-induced epileptic shock
Member # 742
posted
^^^^
Thanks, Mim, exactly what I think. We can't discuss the operations at Utopia Planitia in one thread but as soon as someone tells us 'that one Sabre was the 'USS Pile of Shit'' we say 'oh, ignore it. I never heard that, and neither did anyone else.'. If we do it, we have to do it right. It would be interesting to figure out what's the original name of the Centaur, where the Yeager-class designation from DS9 originated or what was written on this ship or other small things like that. I remember there was a time when everyone wanted to figure out which ships were present at Wolf 359. Some dudes even started web-projects and reference sites and such things. And talkied to people who might know. This one may be unimportant compared to those things, but nontheless, it's part of the reason we are here. Don't you think?
OK, back to the topic; so no one ever found out what's the name of the ship? My guess would be Melbourne, too, even if the ship itself was not labeled, there was this small dedication at the base of it, saying 'USS Melbourne NCC-62043'. Can't see if it's still there, but it could be. Continuing this, if this is the starship Melbourne, we'd get some interesting new aspects of that ship. Seeing it with the modifications and a standard dish, the whole 'Melbourne=prototype'-theory could be a misinterpretation.
-------------------- "This is great. Usually it's just cardboard walls in a garage."
Registered: Nov 2001
| IP: Logged
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
