quote:Anyway, does anyone know how to copy an image from the Season 3 box set of TNG? Greg Jein had still pictures that shows the battle damage USS Princeton from the side.
Hello? Excuse me? Just what is this all about? I haven't heard this before. Are you saying that there's a picture of the Princeton that's different than the one pic we've all seen?
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709
posted
*alarm goes off*.. fanboys rush out of bed and grab helmets and slide down the pole of the Fanboy Fire Station..
we have a new W359 pic?!
Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Damnit... in the Season 3 box, Greg talks about how the production crew built a 4 foot Galaxy Class with more detail and compared the 6 foot nacelle on one hand and the 4 foot nacelle on the other to see the difference. Then a slide show appears with pictures of the models he built. I saw the Enterprise-C, some alien vessels, and the Princeton. Greg definately had some 4 foot molds left over to build some starships.
-------------------- "It speaks to some basic human needs: that there is a tomorrow, it's not all going to be over with a big splash and a bomb, that the human race is improving, that we have things to be proud of as humans." -Gene Roddenberry about Star Trek
Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
So I'm taking it that this was a scene on the DVD itself, & you're asking if someone could make a screencap of it.
So, since you saw it, Michael T, could you perhaps describe what you saw? In extremely minute detail, if you'd be so kind?
[ July 24, 2002, 11:39: Message edited by: Dukhat ]
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
1992 was both the Barcelona summer Olympics and the Albertville winter Olympics. That was the last year both the summer and winter Olympics were in the same year. After that, they only waited two years for Lillehammer, then stayed on the four-year rotations that keep the summer and winter games staggered.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
But...I can't wait until Friday...I want it now!
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
Redneck BWC
Ex-Member
posted
2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday...
Is it still Wednesday?
2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday... 2 more days until Friday...
IP: Logged
posted
Wow. I mean, wow. That's just fucking awesome. The only thing that could be more awesome is if I received a reply from Robert Legato (which so far, I haven't).
Ok, let's get back into Wolf 359 research mode...
1. Masaki Taniko stated that when he saw the model at the convention, both the deflector and the shuttlebay were blown away. Seems he was right.
2. The nacelles look to me to be re-positioned into the one-nacelle-above-the-ship's-centerline shot that was shown onscreen. Or is it just me?
3. The pylon connecting the lower nacelle seems to be much thicker, shorter, and less angular than the upper pylons. It almost reminded me of the submarine conning tower pylon from the Challenger model.
Now I wish there was a still shot of the Firebrand. I guess you can't have everything...
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
And no, that person is not Brannon Braga. At least as far as I know.
*dreamy voice* Wow, that was one of those suprise moments... confirming my belive that the two nacelles were on top, that the pylon was thicker, and it was a real modle, not a miniture like this guy at SCN said. A suprise moment,*end dreamy voice, change to really funny story voice like the time I took my watch off in four months, seeing it perfectly outlined on my skin, how the tightness had left scars in my arms, and recoling from the horror of the stench of all that sweat escaping... boy howdy, now I tell ya what... *starts rambling aimlessly*
IP: Logged
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
