Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Registries... again (Page 6)

  This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6   
Author Topic: Registries... again
Reverend
Based on a true story...
Member # 335

 - posted      Profile for Reverend     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by TSN:
"When they are publishing the next TM we probably find out what she is really..."

So, what you're saying is that we'll never know?

Maybe one day Sternbach will do an article on the Sovvie and we'll get to know where those dorsal-aft launchers are [Wink]

--------------------
Dark Knight Adventures & Batman Beyond:Stripped - DeviantArt Gallery
================================
...what we demand is a total absence of solid facts!

Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PsyLiam:
quote:
Originally posted by Boris:

One such exception are the suffices on the Enterprises and a few other ships such as the Relativity.

The Relativity being a real Starfleet ship now?
Well that and the Aeon have to be real... otherwise the events in Future's End and Relativity wouldn't have taken place? They weren't episodes with a reset button.

Take Future's End - if there was no Aeon and no Braxton and no going back in time - then there is No Doc's holoemitter. Which has been a key point in the rest of the series.

Although this means the future is set in stone - but not necessarily - as Braxton in Relativity say that he has no knowledge of the event Janeway talks about then there must be a parallel dimension thing happening here.

So there is no real time-travel just a lot of new dimension creation.

Like in Yesterday's Enterprise - someone told me - and explained how there is actually 3 timelines in that episode... I THINK it is something like

The original time-line with Tasha dying at Vagra II and she was never in the past.

The altered timeline where the Feds are at war with the Klingons

The new timeline where there is a Tasha Yar from the altenate future now present in the past - when she wasn't there before.

That MIGHT be what he's getting at - but maybe alt-Tasha was ALWAYS on the E-C when she was destroyed when some of the crew escaped.

MAYBE it was the presence of Tasha Yar that led some of the crew to abandon ship - which Garret didn't order in the first timeline.

Temporal mechanics *throws hands in air*

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3