Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » DS9 Season 1 (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: DS9 Season 1
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Just to end the confusion in the other thread, here's where DS9-1 screenshot-talk should go.

So, you wants Wolf 359 shots? Give me some time.

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Linky

Nothing very exciting. First the Saratoga and the Melbourne attack, Melbourne's saucer is destroyed and Saratoga manages to launch a few lifeboats, and then explodes. In the meantime the Yamaguchi and the Bellerephon are also attacking the cube. And somehow the Bonestell is involved too. And a nameless Nebula variant.

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Phoenix
Active Member
Member # 966

 - posted      Profile for Phoenix     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Which is the ship that there's confusion over whether it's an Excelsior or a Nebula, and why?
Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's the one that gets cut up by the Borg beam in this photoset, AND the distant one that hovers gutted in the background in the final photo of the set, to the upper right.

Reputedly, both these models (the first an Excelsior, the second a Galaxy kitbash of a design that would later be refined and called the Nebula class) were labeled "USS Melbourne NCC-62043". The Nebula-like ship got this registry for "BoBW", but when a more detailed model was needed for "Emissary", the name and number were applied on an Excelsior.

As these photos nicely show, it is impossible to read the names or numbers on EITHER of the ships by watching the episode(s). By adjusting brightness on the Excelsior pics, one can bring out the lettering - but it still isn't easy.

Dialogue in "Emissary" doesn't suggest the presence of a starship named Melbourne. Dialogue in "BoBW" suggests that a ship named Melbourne is one of the wrecks on the viewscreen as Shelby and Riker watch the scene of carnage - and that viewscreen shows one Nebula model, but no Excelsior models.

Personally, I am ready to say that the Excelsior wasn't a Melbourne at all. If even the DVD cannot reveal the name and registry, then the ship for practical purposes was of unknown name and registry. Much like all those Excelsiors that appeared alongside the E-D... If we relied on backstage info on their identities, we'd find out they were all named Excelsior, or Hood, or whatever was printed on the model at the time!

The evidence for the identity of the other supposed Melbourne is even flimsier. Yet if we use as the starting point the idea that a Melbourne did exist (as dialogue confirms), and that the registry is correct (and since many registries we believe in are "made up" for Okudagrams only, we need not really care about the origins here), then a Nebula-like ship is a likelier candidate than an Excelsior.

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
SoundEffect
Active Member
Member # 926

 - posted      Profile for SoundEffect     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I find it hard to believe that the DVD is of inferior quality to a good copy of Emmissary on VHS. I'll see if I can get a screenshot of the Melbourne. It's plain as day on VHS.

--------------------
Stephen L.
-Maritime Science Fiction Modelers-

Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Spike
Pathetic Vampire
Member # 322

 - posted      Profile for Spike     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
The evidence for the identity of the other supposed Melbourne is even flimsier.
Why? We have screenshots of the damaged Nebula-model with readable name and registry and a desktop model.

--------------------
"Never give up. And never, under any circumstances, no matter what - never face the facts." - Ruth Gordon

Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
neither visible onscreen
Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
SUPPOSED TO HAVE ICE POWERS!!
Member # 646

 - posted      Profile for The Mighty Monkey of Mim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by CaptainMike:
neither visible onscreen

Doesn't matter.

--------------------
The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.

Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mikey T
Driven
Member # 144

 - posted      Profile for Mikey T     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I just rewatched the Season 4 TNG episode "The Wounded" and noticed that inside Captain Maxwell's Ready Room is the Nebula Class study model that Okuda didn't blow up... the same model that is shown in Parallels.

Wait... no back stage info about the episode?

--------------------
"It speaks to some basic human needs: that there is a tomorrow, it's not all going to be over with a big splash and a bomb, that the human race is improving, that we have things to be proud of as humans."
-Gene Roddenberry about Star Trek

Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://members.lycos.nl/harrysdump/trek/screens/ds9/emissary/ds9_emissary18.jpg

Hmm... looking at this screenshot of the Yamaguchi, it's eminently clear that either there's no inset into the deflector dish at all, or else that inset is colored blue like the rest of the dish.

It *does" have the red impulse engine, though. [Wink]

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
SoundEffect
Active Member
Member # 926

 - posted      Profile for SoundEffect     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by MinutiaeMan:
http://members.lycos.nl/harrysdump/trek/screens/ds9/emissary/ds9_emissary18.jpg

Hmm... looking at this screenshot of the Yamaguchi, it's eminently clear that either there's no inset into the deflector dish at all, or else that inset is colored blue like the rest of the dish.

It *does" have the red impulse engine, though. [Wink]

It's clear that the Yamaguchi in that shot is blurry, that's all I gather. We have a plethora of photos of the studio miniature of Yamaguchi and it does in fact have an inset in the deflector.

Since I don't have any of the DVDs, I can't do this myself, but one of you guys could try this. Start at the point where the Excelsior Class Melbourne is already destroyed and play the scene backwards from that point at normal speed if possible. You may find it easier to read the name and registry on the hull. I actually got the number off the hull before I saw the entry in the Encyclopedia, so for me the confirmation was the other way around.

--------------------
Stephen L.
-Maritime Science Fiction Modelers-

Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
What is the nameless nebula variant?? I thought the ship seen out the escape-pod window was a wrecked Connie saucer?

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim:
quote:
Originally posted by CaptainMike:
neither visible onscreen

Doesn't matter.
we've disregarded behind the scenes data that contradicts visible filmed canon before, you know.. the Melbourne was plainly visible as an Excelsior, its registry was clear, even on VHS. The Nebula never came close to being readable or identifiable as being named Melbourne
Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Peregrinus
Curmudgeon-at-Large
Member # 504

 - posted      Profile for Peregrinus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Andrew -- go here.

My public face is in line with the official party line that the Mebourne is an Excelsior, but I still maintain in private that it's a Nebula, and hope that one day the truth will out. [Big Grin]

--Jonah

--------------------
"That's what I like about these high school girls, I keep getting older, they stay the same age."

--David "Woody" Wooderson, Dazed and Confused

Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged
Gvsualan
Perpetual Member
Member # 968

 - posted      Profile for Gvsualan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The "official" stance at THE website doesn't give a definite class identification to the Melbourne, however:

quote:
A starship among the first of the four in the U.S.S. Saratoga's group at the Battle of Wolf 359 to be locked on by the Borg and put out of commission: the enemy's cutting beam destroyed the port side of its primary hull and was one of 39 vessel casualties there in 2367. It was stationed in 2364 at Starbase 74 and was in range when the Bynars hijacked the Galaxy-class Enterprise, but could not respond due to maintenance adjustments in progress. In late 2366, Commander William Riker was offered its command but declined in favor of remaining as first officer on board the Galaxy-class U.S.S. Enterprise. The Melbourne was named for the Australian city on Earth.
The description of its destruction quite clearly represents the 'Excelsior-class Melbourne theory'/scene viewed in "Emissary".

--------------------
Hey, it only took 13 years for me to figure out my password...

Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3