posted
Crystal atoms of whatever material is used for manufacturing them would be in the range between 10^-10m (hydrogen) to 1nm=10^-9m (complex atoms) diameter. Let's be optimistic and assume a 3nm cube=27 atoms for one switching element (something like a transistor) and 8nm including all wiring and insulation between them. For basic intelligence and autonomous functions, a minimum of roughly 1 million switching elements would be required. This makes a size of 800nm^3 for the electronics, the power supply, sensors and the mechanical parts still not included, let alone a microreplicator.
Nanotechnological components are small compared to electronic circuitry as of 1999 where 1 transistor is as big as a complete nanite, yet they are not submicroscopic. The microscopic views of the nanites in TNG and nanoprobes in Voyager suggest an even larger size, for they showed an even surface and didn't allow to distinguish single atoms which would have been possible even with present day technology.
------------------ "No, thanks. I've had enough. One more cup and I'll jump to warp." (Janeway, asked if she would like some coffee in "Once upon a Time") www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/
posted
I have to check how big a cell is. Anyway, cells and nanoprobes have similar functionalities, yet, I expect the nanoprobes to be more cramped.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Simon
Ex-Member
posted
Nanoprobes would probably be more similar in size to ribosomes than cells. Ribosomes are one of the smallest known components of cells and perform many of the functions a nanite would have to. Since its been a while since I last took biology I don't lnow their exact size, but it is in the nanometer range.
IP: Logged
posted
What type of cells have we seen together with the nanoprobes? Blood cells?
------------------ "No, thanks. I've had enough. One more cup and I'll jump to warp." (Janeway, asked if she would like some coffee in "Once upon a Time") www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/
Printer-friendly view of this topic
