posted
I find his preface disconcerting enough. He references the Podkletnov experiment, failing to note that no one else has ever replicated Podkletnov's results despite concerted effort. He also espouses Behe's "intelligent design" creationism.
In any case, that's not a good basis from which to utterly redraw the scientific map. On the other hand, he does have pretty pictures to show.
-------------------- . . . ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
