Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Stargazer reference material request

   
Author Topic: Stargazer reference material request
ProfKSergeev
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Hello, everyone! Some of you may know me from the Starship Modeler forums. Anyway, I'm searching for reference material of the Stargazer in preparation for building my own. I'm trying to follow the yellow desk model instead of the studio model, and while you might not think it, there are quite a few differences. I've got all of the available online photos of the Stargazer - as far as I know - so was hoping that some of you here might be willing to share hitherto unknown or hard-to-find shots with me of (preferably) the desk-model or the studio model. All help will be greatly appreciated.

Lauren Oliver
[email protected]

P.S. If you'd like to see some of my completed models, Trek and otherwise, have a look here:
[link removed]

[ January 16, 2005, 10:52 PM: Message edited by: TSN ]

IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Let's avoid the spammish bit at the end there, shall we?
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
ProfKSergeev
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Link removed? I thought I might get a reply like that. Look, I am not trying to sell anything, and I don't see anything wrong with posting a link to my completed Trek models at the end of a genuine post asking for help. I do apologise, however, for the fact that my site is on Tripod and therefore has unavoidable banners.
IP: Logged
ProfKSergeev
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
Wow. This is a truly low and mean forum. Josef Stalin could learn a thing or two from you. Following my recent history of having perfectly innocent links to my (non-commercial) website removed, I retract my request for reference material from this forum's members. Your dictatorial, arbitrary, and petty behaviour is shameful. Have a look at the "Starship Modeler" boards (to which many of this forum's members also subscribe) if you want to learn how to run a convivial, civilised forum.

Lauren Oliver

P.S. Please revoke my membership with all due speed. I feel so filthy!

IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I call Nikolay Bukharin.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Have a look at the 'Starship Modeler' boards (to which many of this forum's members also subscribe) if you want to learn how to run a convivial, civilised forum."

Have a look at the rules of the place before you post if you want to learn how to not look like an idiot and have to storm out in a petty huff.

(P.S. Your own hygiene problems are not our responsibility.)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Heheheh, dirty.

The problem is ProfKSergeev that the there are people out there - as you know - who want to do nothing but just SPAM boards such as these. Post a few posts, sit and chat - maybe even put a link to your site in your subject line and people can go there at their leisure. What's the use of having someone join up for one post and all that post is - is of someone posting a link to their site? Not very condusive to discussion.

Look forward to more of your posts (unless you are undergoing a 'dry-clean'!?! [Big Grin] )

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
SoundEffect
Active Member
Member # 926

 - posted      Profile for SoundEffect     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's called the double standard. I've seen it happen before to me too. If I posted a link to your site Prof and said: "Wow, look at this guy's models!", we'd have two pages of discussion going.

If I post a link to my own site (as you did) it suddenly becomes spam?!

--------------------
Stephen L.
-Maritime Science Fiction Modelers-

Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Reverend
Based on a true story...
Member # 335

 - posted      Profile for Reverend     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As somone who still hasn't read the rule book, I hazard a guess that posting links to your own stuff is a bit of a conflict of interests.

--------------------
Dark Knight Adventures & Batman Beyond:Stripped - DeviantArt Gallery
================================
...what we demand is a total absence of solid facts!

Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256

 - posted      Profile for Cartman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The difference between linking to your own site (whatever its content) in your signature and linking to it IN YOUR FIRST POST is that the latter is considered pushy screamy advertisement and the former a casual unobtrusive reference. Why? Because in 99.99% of all cases, that's what those links ARE.

And if that small yet important rule upsets you enough to invoke Godwin's law, then PLEASE don't let the door hit you on the way out.

[ January 17, 2005, 11:46 AM: Message edited by: Cartman ]

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Charles Capps
We appreciate your concern.
It is noted and stupid.
Member # 9

 - posted      Profile for Charles Capps     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Cartman:
The difference between linking to your own site (whatever its content) in your signature and linking to it IN YOUR FIRST POST is that the latter is considered pushy screamy advertisement and the former a casual unobtrusive reference. Why? Because in 99.99% of all cases, that's what those links ARE.

And if that small yet important rule upsets you enough to invoke Godwin's law, then PLEASE don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner. And with that, the sweet sound of topic closure.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
   

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3