Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Misc Info on BoPs, Maquis Raider and Defiant

   
Author Topic: Misc Info on BoPs, Maquis Raider and Defiant
Jim Phelps
watches Voyager AFTER 51030
Member # 102

 - posted      Profile for Jim Phelps     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hmmm....looks like I'm gonna be making a weekly column out of this...

Anyway, I read the previously mentioned September 16, 1982 outline of Star Trek III. There are no Klingons at this point, only Romulans. Originally, the Genesis planet was to be full of dilithium which the Roms wanted to exploit, Sarek was to be extremely mean to Kirk for not bringing back Spock's body, and fear the unleashed power of Genesis as a threat by the Federation to the More Superior Vulcan culture (they appear to be somewhat vary of their allies). Spock is alive and well on Genesis, except that he's somewhat barbaric and emotionally unstable, but no Fal-Tor-Pan is necessary to revive him (everyone goes back directly to Earth at the end). Anyway, this is off-topic, so here is the real deal:

1) The BoP is described as a "giant Romulan Bird of Prey". This and the presence of an elevator suggest a larger size than the final version. No landing capabilities are necessary at this point, which may have served to cut down on the size subsequently (the BoP was shown landed in an Art of Star Trek sketch -before- the design was finalized, so the 110-or-50 question might not have been affected by this, or at least not yet).

2) The Star Trek Communicator 105 has an article on Visual Effects of DS9 and VOY, in which David Stipes mentions that the Maquis raider is 1/5th the size of Voyager. He worked on the VFX for Caretaker, and also noted that the Array model was 5 feet long, the Maquis ship nearly two feet, while the Voyager miniature, as we know, is 5 feet long.

3) The article furthermore confirms that Visual Effects Supervisor Gary Hutzel was involved in the design of the Defiant (mentioning the pulse phaser guns in particular). Also interesting is the line about the Defiant: "whose experimental sleekness he helped design". Is the Defiant sleek -because- it is experimental?

Boris

------------------
"Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story."

---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide

[This message has been edited by Boris (edited October 29, 1999).]

[This message has been edited by Boris (edited October 29, 1999).]


Registered: Apr 1999  |  IP: Logged
The First One
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed
Member # 35

 - posted      Profile for The First One         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hardly. Few ships in Star Trek had been what you'd call sleek, because they wanted to avoid the clich�d images of starships in SF. Just putting a ship with such smooth lines into the show could be considered an experiment.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3