posted
They could also possibly be launchers or emitters or deflectors or sensors. Does anyone have a clue what they could be? Certainly as large as the Warbird is, it couldn't possibly land on anything with an appreciable gravity field. Perhaps a very small moon?
--Baloo
------------------ Welcome to the museum of really dangerous things. Feel free to pick up and handle any of the displays. www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/
posted
Those ventral things could be plasma torp launchers. After all, they feature three side-by-side holes, as did the bow of the original Romulan ship from TOS...
As for landing capacity, I very much doubt it. But in "The Battle", we hear a Ferengi ship hid in a crater of a nearby moon to ambusth the Stargazer. Was this a D'Kora behemoth or a smaller, so far unseen Ferengi ship type? The giant Ferengi ships /might/ be configured for landing so that they could serve as dirtside marketplaces.
posted
That might explain their least aesthetically pleasing aspect: their flat bottoms. The first time I saw a Ferengi ship on TNG I remember thinking: "Wow! Ugh!" in quick succession when I saw just how different they looked. The ship was simultaneously beautiful and ugly, partly because of the flat bottom. If there's a functional reason for that flatness, it makes it easier for me to accept that one jarring feature.
--Baloo
------------------ Welcome to the museum of really dangerous things. Feel free to pick up and handle any of the displays. www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/
posted
I thought those claw things were the Romulan censors.
"We don't like your script! It's got too much naughtiness! We're here to shred it!"
------------------ 'In every country and in every age the priest has been hostile to Liberty; he is always in allegiance to the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection of his own." ---- Thomas Jefferson
posted
I'm not quite sure, but I think the Warbirds were firing from these locations in "The Die is Cast". Of course, this doesn't exclude that there is a landing gear as well. If we refer to the design history of the ship, it was vertical at first and therefore definitely not suited to land.
------------------ "When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way." A somewhat different Janeway in VOY: "Living Witness" Ex Astris Scientia
posted
If it were to be landing legs, don't you think the top wing would be subjected to a lot of stress when the Warbird is on the ground??
------------------ Presenting the NX-59650. It can slice! It can dice! It can seperate into THREE parts!! Now available with THREE FULL warpcores! But wait! Buy now, and get a free number upgrade to NX-74913!
posted
The question is what it would be useful for to land the Warbird on a moon. I don't have an answer.
------------------ "When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way." A somewhat different Janeway in VOY: "Living Witness" Ex Astris Scientia