posted
According to the ST:TNG Companion, the following models of starships were present in the battle site of "The Best of Both Worlds" 2 (* denotes ship class that have been seen)-
Challenger* Cheyenne* Freedom* Nebula* New Orleans* Niagara* Rigel* Springfield
From what I have observed, the kit-bashed ships were composed from parts of five classes of ships-Ambassador, Constellation, Constitution, Excelsior Galaxy. This could mean that the Springfield which is yet to be seen may be a combination, for example, of Galaxy and Ambassador. Are there ideas about how this ship looks or has anyone seen this ship?
posted
The Springfield class could have been represented by one of the Excelsior study models.
------------------ "The record of my unspeakable crimes, in previous lives, in previous times, indelibly stains the pages of history." -- They Might Be Giants
posted
Bernd: I am afraid that my eyes are not that powerful. I trust in the FF. BTW, how is that you can see through the bow of the Shelly Class starship and project what the stern appears as?
*NCC-45617 / / =angle of camera
camera shows starboard bow with battle damage. the beauty shot of the ship ends when the scene switches to the bridge of the defiant leaving the stern unseen the STDS9 TM could be right or you could be right
posted
TSN: Mr. Okuda is wrong. When the USS Enterprise D is seen entering the battlefield, there is a shot of the secondary hull of a Constitution Class starship on the left side of the screen. This Class of ship is the only one I know of that has the four square windows about two decks above the keel. In the Enterprise A, these windows were a bluish color. I believe this is the arboreteum of this class of starship. Could this be a closeup of the USS Buran or of another class of starship we haven't seen it?
IP: Logged
posted
Okay, let me rephrase that... He doesn't think they used any Const'n parts in the kitbashes. I think that sec. hull was nothing more than, well, a secondary hull, thrown in and burned up. I don't think it was part of a larger model (except maybe the kit they got it from...).
------------------ "I fart in your general direction!" -John Cleese, Monty Python and the Holy Grail
And I don't have any images. Go away! Well, none that show anything of use, anyway.
------------------ http://frankg.dgne.com/ Motormaster: "Megatron's in trouble!" Dead End: "Who cares?" Wildrider: "It looks like Starscream's defeated him!" Dead End: "So?"
posted
May those infamous Star Trek Fact Files might produce another pretty ship like the Niagara, Challenger, Rigel and Freedom classes. Yes, I'm teasing, I'm more of a Galaxy/Nebula/Sovereign man myself.
------------------ Remember when we used to be explorers? - Capt. Jean-Luc Picard - Star Trek Insurrection
Lindsly: I think you refer to the saucer-hull connection, since the Encyclopedia shows the stern shuttlebay as well.
Basically I assume that the modelers don't spend much time in making detail changes to the kitbashed models, although this were often necessary for the sake of plausibility. Take a saucer, engineering hull, and a pair (or three ) nacelles, and that's it, unfortunately.
One more thought about the Constitution secondary hull: In BoBW it's a very close shot, and this part is definitely much more detailed than the AMT kit. Could it be they used (part of) an actual studio model? Could it be the rest of the Enterprise blown up in STTSFS? Anyway, maybe we have to look for the Challenger class somewhere else at Wolf 359, and maybe we're lucky it doesn't actually have Constitution components.
posted
Maybe Okuda considers the refit enterprise and the enterprise-a as enterprise class starships? I've seen them called that a couple times before.
------------------ "How many people does it take before it becomes wrong? 6,000? 60,000? How many people does it take admiral!?!" -Ambassador Picard during his command of the Enterprise-E in the Ba'ku incident.
posted
But not in the Encyclopedia, which Okuda wrote and which presumably reflects his opinion on the matter.
------------------ "The record of my unspeakable crimes, in previous lives, in previous times, indelibly stains the pages of history." -- They Might Be Giants