Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » "By configuration-a starship." (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: "By configuration-a starship."
colin
Active Member
Member # 217

 - posted      Profile for colin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

This line of dialogue from the episode "The Doomsday Machine" is the topic of this thread.

Configuration is defined as "The form of a figure as determined by the arrangement of its parts; outline; contour."

I interpret this line as saying that starships of the 2260's had the same basic design-a circular primary hull connected to a long tubular secondary hull with two connected smaller tubes for the warp engines. If there were other configurations of starships, wouldn't have Mr. Spock identified the ship by class, as he did with Harry Mudd's cargo ship ("Mudd's Women")?

And this line gives information on the other ships of the fleet. No other class in the fleet had the same configuration of parts as did the U.S.S. Enterprise and her sister ships. These ships were unique in their appearance.

I use this line as evidence that the U.S.S. Carolina ("Friday's Child") is a Constitution Class starship. She is identified as a starship by the U.S.S. Enterprise bridge crew.

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory


Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Another possibility is that starship simply meant "Starfleet vessel of certain size and capabilities" and all of those had two distinguishing and easily identifiable features: saucer primary hulls, and standoff nacelles for the warp coils. These features would distinguish the ships sufficiently from just about everything else we saw (except the Romulan vessel which arguably had saucer and nacelles, but she wasn't Starfleet). And semantically, specifying the primary hull as a saucer and specifying the positioning of the warp coils as being in nacelles equals describing the "configuration", at least AFAIC.

So in essence, if sensors show a ship with a saucer and nacelles, it is likely to be a big Starfleet exploration-and combat-capable deep space vessel, that is, a starship. Constitutions, Mirandas, Federations, Loknars... All of those meet the criteria. Antareses, Independences, Sydneys, class J freighters,
alien ships, and assorted other space junk do not.

Timo Saloniemi


Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It seems like this is yet again an argument for the early Starfleet classification using the term 'starship'.

First, the Enterprise is said to be a Starship Class ship. This is most likely not the name of the class, but more the type of ship.
Second, in "Relics", Scotty says he 'served on cruiser,.... and starships'. This also seems to imply that starship was a distinguished type of ship.
And this particular line of dialogue also says that by configuration (e.g. capabilities, weaponry, etc.) the particular ship was of the type 'Starship', instead of a cruiser, tanker or something different.

So, this is evidence that the USS Carolina is of the 'starship' type, but it doesn't necessarily say what class it is.
IMHO of course
------------------
"Dynamics is like playing hockey with a flexible hockey stick"
-My Physics teacher
---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site

[This message has been edited by Prakesh (edited November 29, 2000).]


Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Tech Sergeant Chen
Member
Member # 350

 - posted      Profile for Tech Sergeant Chen         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Do they refer to alien ships as starships? Seems like they may call it generally a vessel or a ship, or specifically a warbird or battlecruiser but not a starship. OTOMH, I can't recall any mention of Klingon or Breen starships. So maybe they reserve the term for frontline Fed ships. It can't apply to every ship with interstellar capability, otherwise warp-capable shuttles would be included.
Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I can't remember any definite references to alien starships, either. I do remember, though, that Scotty actually said he had served on "cruisers, freighters... starships". There was no "and" there. Perhaps he meant to use "starship" as a designation that would include the vessels he had listed before? That is, cruisers and freighters would be some of the starship types in existence.

Another possibility is that Scotty was enumerating the "operational categories" of the ships he had served on: cruisers (as in pleasure cruisers, cruise liners, Love Boats), freighters (as in commercial cargo carriers) and starships (as in any Starfleet vessels of military or exploration persuasion). So the "cruiser" in this list would not be the same as the "heavy cruiser" in Starfleet designation schemes, but more like the civilian "space cruiser Aurora" of TOS "Way to Eden" infamy.

A third possibility is of course that Scotty was using the old 23rd century system where "starship" was a ship designation comparable to cruiser or frigate, possibly a less offending analogy to today's "battleship" - just as you suggest. I also like to think that this is what "starship" originally meant after the term had been coined specifically for the Constitution class, but that the word very soon came to mean all Starfleet vessels. Even pre-Constitution spaceships were then retconned as starships, even if nobody back in 2196 had referred to the Daedalus vessels by that name.

Timo Saloniemi


Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
colin
Active Member
Member # 217

 - posted      Profile for colin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TIMO
I agree with your last statement. There is evidence to support this contention.

In 2253, the year of the episode "The Cage", the U.S.S. Enterprise is identified as United Star Ship Enterprise. This is the earliest recorded instance of the word 'starship' being used. Strangely, in this early period of the Enterprise's life, she carried no dedication plate.

12 years later, the Enterprise has a plate that identifies her as of the Starship Class.

2 years later, the Class J starship is mentioned. This starship is older than the Enterprise. This is the first known instance in Star Trek history that different starship classes, from the primary class, are identified.

Decades later, the U.S.S. Reliant and the U.S.S. Excelsior are identified as starships.
I see the Constitution Class having probably the following ships by year:

2253
NCC-956 U.S.S. Eagle
NCC-1017 U.S.S. Constellation
NCC-1371 U.S.S. Republic
NCC-1647 U.S.S. Farrugut
NCC-1657 U.S.S. Potemkin
NCC-1664 U.S.S. Excalibur
NCC-1672 U.S.S. Exeter
NCC-1685 U.S.S. C- or D-
NCC-1697 U.S.S. Essex
NCC-1700 U.S.S. Constitution
NCC-1701 U.S.S. Enterprise
NCC-1703 U.S.S. Hood
NCC-1709 U.S.S. Lexington
NCC-1710 U.S.S. Kongo
(If there was an earlier U.S.S. Constitution, this ship had to be destroyed before 2253.)

2265
NCC-956 U.S.S. Eagle
NCC-1017 U.S.S. Constellation
NCC-1371 U.S.S. Republic
NCC-1657 U.S.S. Potemkin
NCC-1664 U.S.S. Excalibur
NCC-1672 U.S.S. Exeter
NCC-1685 U.S.S. C- or D-
NCC-1697 U.S.S. Essex
NCC-1700 U.S.S. Constitution
NCC-1701 U.S.S. Enterprise
NCC-1703 U.S.S. Hood
NCC-1709 U.S.S. Lexington
NCC-1710 U.S.S. Kongo
NCC-1717 U.S.S. Yorktown
NCC-1718 U.S.S. C- or D-
NCC-1831 U.S.S. Intrepid
(NCC-1647 U.S.S. Farrugut destroyed in 2257.)

2267
"Tommorow is Yesterday"
NCC-956 U.S.S. Eagle
NCC-1017 U.S.S. Constellation
NCC-1371 U.S.S. Republic
NCC-1657 U.S.S. Potemkin
NCC-1664 U.S.S. Excalibur
NCC-1672 U.S.S. Exeter
NCC-1700 U.S.S. Constitution
NCC-1701 U.S.S. Enterprise
NCC-1703 U.S.S. Hood
NCC-1709 U.S.S. Lexington
NCC-1710 U.S.S. Kongo
NCC-1717 U.S.S. Yorktown
NCC-1831 U.S.S. Intrepid
(Capt. Kirk says there are twelve ships like the U.S.S. Enterprise in the Star Fleet. If you count the above list, you will see there are twelve ships, plus one-the Enterprise, to make thirteen. The unknown NCC-1685 C- or D-, NCC-1718 C- or D, and NCC-1697 U.S.S. Essex were destroyed before this episode.)

2267
"Friday's Child"
U.S.S. Carolina is added to the list of Constitution Class starships. She is new to the fleet and has her name given to a later 24th century starship. The known number of Constitution Class starships is 14.

2267
"The Doomsday Machine"
U.S.S. Constellation is lost. Number is now 13.

2268
"The Immunity Syndrome"
U.S.S. Intrepid is lost. Number is now 12.

2268
"The Ultimate Computer"
U.S.S. Excalibur is lost. Number is now 11.

2268
"The Omega Glory"
U.S.S. Exeter is probably deemed unuseable as a result of contagion aboard ship and is destroyed. (ex. U.S.S. Lantree). Number is now 10.

2268
"The Tholian Web"
U.S.S. Defiant NCC-1764 is added to the list of Constitution Class starships. Before her crew has time to decide on ship symbol, she is lost. Number is 12 and then 11. (The uniforms of the Defiant crew carry no insignia. She is given an older registry.)

2269
Ships in class
NCC-956 U.S.S. Eagle
NCC-1371 U.S.S. Republic
NCC-1657 U.S.S. Potemkin
NCC-1700 U.S.S. Constitution
NCC-1701 U.S.S. Enterprise
NCC-1703 U.S.S. Hood
NCC-1709 U.S.S. Lexington
NCC-1710 U.S.S. Kongo
NCC-1717 U.S.S. Yorktown
NCC- U.S.S. Carolina
The class have one or two ships that are not known at this point. Between 2269 and 2280, the U.S.S. Endeavor is built.

2286
Constitution Class ships are being constructed. One of these new ships is the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-A.

2293
Known ships in fleet
NCC-956 U.S.S. Eagle
NCC-1371 U.S.S. Republic
NCC-1657 U.S.S. Potemkin
NCC-1701-A U.S.S. Enterprise
NCC-1710 U.S.S. Kongo
NCC-1717 U.S.S. Yorktown
NCC-1895 U.S.S. Endeavor

2293
U.S.S. Enterprise is retired for p.r. and political reasons. A new ship, the U.S.S. Enterprise, is launched. This ship reflects the hopes and confidence of Starfleet in a new class of ships, the Excelsior.

2324
U.S.S. Republic begins service as a cadet ship.

2367
An unknown Constitution Class starship is identified in the wreckage of Wolf 359. This ship, broken in two, fought in the conflict and was subsequently destroyed. This starship had to be less than 100 years old to be fit for combat.

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory

[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited November 30, 2000).]


Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm curious as to where you got initial letters to the names of the 1685 and 1718. I thought the display these were on didn't have names...?

------------------
"What he did to that walrus gentle-man was inexcusable."
-T. Herman Zweibel on "Mr. Woodrow Wood-pecker", The Onion, 7-Nov-2000


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
In the Cage, didn't that actually say "United SPACE Ship Enterprise"?

------------------
"I am in one of those rare periods of life where I am convinced I am a sexy devil."- Simon "Sol System" Sizer


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
United Space Ship, yes.
Later, Kirk called it United Star Ship

24th century captains say Federation Star Ship Big-Shippy-Looking-Thing

------------------
"Dynamics is like playing hockey with a flexible hockey stick"
-My Physics teacher
---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site


Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Ritten
A Terrible & Sick leek
Member # 417

 - posted      Profile for Ritten     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"I am Captain Ritten of the FSSBSLT Lollipop."

Yep, it beats being captain of the starship Lollipop...

------------------
Well, it's done, yes, the deed is done.


Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Nothing wrong w/ the Lollipop. It's a good ship... :-)

------------------
"What he did to that walrus gentle-man was inexcusable."
-T. Herman Zweibel on "Mr. Woodrow Wood-pecker", The Onion, 7-Nov-2000


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Oh, this ship sucks!"

"Is sucked, you mean."

------------------
What did it mean to you
An early chat with death
To pull your body for a moment from your soul
--
Camper Van Beethoven
****
Read chapter TWO of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"! Now with 30% more plot.


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Ritten
A Terrible & Sick leek
Member # 417

 - posted      Profile for Ritten     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Although, unlike Timex, it can't take a lickin'...

------------------
Well, it's done, yes, the deed is done.


Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
colin
Active Member
Member # 217

 - posted      Profile for colin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks to everyone for catching my mistake.
TSN
I used the accepted registries of ships fouund in the encyclopedias and matched the information to the chart given in "Court Martial". The chart reads from top to bottom-

NCC-1709 U.S.S. Lexington
NCC-1831 U.S.S. Intrepid
NCC-1703 U.S.S. Hood
NCC-1672 U.S.S. Exeter
NCC-1664 U.S.S. Excalibur
NCC-1697 U.S.S. Essex
NCC-1701 U.S.S. Enterprise
NCC-1718
NCC-1685
NCC-1700 U.S.S. Constitution

If the list is alphabetical from bottom to top, then the two ships between U.S.S. Constitution and U.S.S. Enterprise must begin with the letters C, D, or E. There can be no other choice.

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory


Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Are you threatening us?

"There can be no other choice. If you do not agree, I will kill you. You have 1 minute to make up your minds."

------------------
"I am in one of those rare periods of life where I am convinced I am a sexy devil."- Simon "Sol System" Sizer


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3