Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Sci-Fi » Designs, Artwork, & Creativity » The Enterprise's Ugly Stepsister

   
Author Topic: The Enterprise's Ugly Stepsister
Baloo
Curmudgeon-in-Chief
Member # 5

 - posted      Profile for Baloo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Newly Edited!
(Look at the eleventh reply!)

Friendship Class Starship

I haven't put anything up at my regular website yet, since the Yagocities merger is still in progress (and they have all my passwords screwed up!)

[It's at my regular site now.]

It's supposed to be a ship that was designed in competition with the Constitution class. It was supposed to be even higher-performance, but proved to be temperamental and prone to malfunction during trials. I still haven't finalized all the details (except the pic. Don't worry. It's SUPPOSED to be ugly!)


Designer: Robert C. Dunehew E-mail [email protected]


"Friendship" class

Inscription on Commissioning Plaque: "Name the greatest of all the inventors: Accident."
-- MARK TWAIN, Notebooks

General Specifications:
Length: 319m
Width: 154m
Height: 51m
Max Warp: 8.5
Cruise: 7
Max. Impulse: 0.65 lightspeed
Crew: 40 officers, 160 enlisted

Armaments: Six heavy laser cannon, 4 fwd, 2 aft. Three accelerator cannon, 2 fwd, 1 aft.

Type: Heavy Cruiser

Status: One prototype produced for comparison with the Constitution prototype, no further examples produced. The original was demilitarized and turned over to the Vulcan Science Academy in 2265.

About Ship: In 2235, Starfleet issued the most demanding specifications for a starship in its history. The "Starship class" specification would, it was hoped, result in a ship far superior to any likely to be fielded in the next 40 years. So demanding were the requirements, that the Federation Council required Starfleet to build one prototype of each of two competing designs, the winner of this competition would be the one produced.

The Friendship's design was quite a bit different from the typical Starfleet vessel of the day. Instead of two warp nacelles set away from the hulls upon long pylons, minimizing the amount of shielding required to protect the crew (as the competing vessel, Constitution, did), the Friendship had a single nacelle, mounted forward. This nacelle housed an enormous bussard collector and four warp coils. The bulky nacelle housing also held much of the shielding required to protect the crew from the strong subspace fields they emitted. This configuration provided a somewhat more stealthy warp field configuration than the Constitution's (single-lobe rather than dual). Warp field efficiency at cruise was somewhat improved, but at the expense of increased antimatter consumption.

While the Constitution could operate for 20 years without resupply, the Friendship could only manage 17 uninterrupted years of operation. Much of this capability came at the cost of crew size (the Constitution had room for 40 additional science personnel). The Friendship compensated for its smaller size by packing a far more comprehensive sensors suite than the prototype Constitution. The main sensor array (MSA) took the form of a large rotodome on the dorsal hull.

During trials, Starfleet test crews discovered that, while living up to most of it's capabilities, the Friendship turned out to be a rather temperamental beast. The quad-coil warp nacelles required a carefully-balanced flow of plasma from the matter/antimatter reactor assembly. This process was controlled by the duotronic computer system, which was barely able to respond to changes in plasma flow requirements at high warp speeds. The short mast upon which the MSA was mounted turned out to be slightly less strong than the actual requirements demanded, and tended to suffer severe damage at accelerations much more than one-quarter impulse power.

The Friendship was intended to out-perform the competing contender, the Constitution. In simulations, it did, but in the metal, the Friendship proved to be more maintenance-intensive than was practical. Ultimately, the Constitution went on to become the class vessel. Its only serious shortcoming against the Friendship was addressed by adding sensors to the main deflector array, giving the Constitution class vessels equivalent sensing ability.

As the Friendship represented a large investment in resources, Starfleet decided to utilize it as a science and research vessel. Two warp coils were removed from the nacelle, and the additional resulting space allowed enough additional internal volume for 30 additional crewmembers. Maximum warp speeds dropped from 7 and 8.5 to 5 and 7. Impulse engines were governed to one-quarter impulse, which could be overridden only in emergencies. The Friendship served as a travelling science vessel until 2265, wherupon is was demilitarized and turned over to the Vulcan Science Academy as a mobile classroom and research facility.


--Baloo

------------------
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons."
--Popular Mechanics, forecasting the relentless march of science, 1949
www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/

[This message has been edited by Baloo (edited June 27, 1999).]

[This message has been edited by Baloo (edited July 07, 1999).]

[This message has been edited by Baloo (edited August 09, 1999).]

[This message has been edited by Baloo (edited August 19, 1999).]


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Deep6
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yep, she's ugly. Still better than I could do though.

------------------
"The brocolli must die!"

-Stewie, The Family Guy


IP: Logged
Sunspot
Wasting Away
Member # 77

 - posted      Profile for Sunspot     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
O_O

I LIKE it!!

*thinks it's cute*

------------------
"Just remember...you're the queen!"
Tom Paris to Janeway, "Bride of Chaotica"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Looks like Starfleet's attempt to corrupt a Klingon design... *wonders why he always thinks people's UFP ships look alien* *shrugs* :-)

------------------
"You! Are you smarter than this one?"
-Ambassador Byleth to LaForge regarding Worf, TNG's "Liasons"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Antagonist
Member
Member # 76

 - posted      Profile for Antagonist     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I actually think the design isn't ugly...though I also don't think the Defiant and Steamrunner don't look ugly either, so that may just be me.

I like the over all layout of the ship, it's interesting to see a ship with it's nacelle(s) up front rather than behind of separate pylons.

This is a...excuse the Frankism, 'nifty' design. Looks very much like it was supoposed to do combat and still allowed for a massive scanning array. Almost pre-Defiant class.

------------------
I shall smite Sternbach with my SpoonSaber!


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Bernd
Guy from Old Europe
Member # 6

 - posted      Profile for Bernd     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't care if people just cut and paste ugly starship designs, not being able to describe it. It's different with Baloo who has the gift to do horrible ships and make them nevertheless credible. I hate it!

------------------
"The past, the present and the future, they exist as one, they breathe together." (Annorax, VOY: "The Year of Hell")
Ex Astris Scientia


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Baloo
Curmudgeon-in-Chief
Member # 5

 - posted      Profile for Baloo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bernd: I'm flattered (I think ).

--Baloo

------------------
"All the wrong people have a good opinion of themselves."
--Baloo
www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Federation Shipmaster
Kai Tak Pilot
Member # 15

 - posted      Profile for Federation Shipmaster     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Very cool background. Thanks for posting it here so I was forced to read it.

------------------


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Baloo
Curmudgeon-in-Chief
Member # 5

 - posted      Profile for Baloo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Now you know enough to look when I provide a link.

--Baloo

------------------
Christ is coming soon.
Look busy.
www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Fabrux
Epic Member
Member # 71

 - posted      Profile for Fabrux     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Baloo: I've always wondered: how do you get the background of your pics to be transparent?

------------------
Fabrux's Starship Page



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Baloo
Curmudgeon-in-Chief
Member # 5

 - posted      Profile for Baloo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
When I create my ships, I usually draw the schematic (black & white line drawing) in MS Paint, as a bitmap. When I'm satisfied it's complete except for the colors, I import the pic to Paint Shop Pro (PSP).

In PSP, I crank the colors up to 24 trillion (or whatever the maximum is ) and color in everything but the background. When the ship is completely done, but for the background, I pick a lurid pink color I KNOW I haven't used anywhere else in the picture, and use that to fill the background (I also select it as the "background color" in the pallette).

I then reduce the number of colors ("decrease color depth) in the pic to 255, using the "optimized medium cut" to the nearest color. After that, I select "Set Pallette Transparency" from the colors menu, and set the current background color (our lurid pink background) to "transparent". I then "view pallette transparency" to ensure I got everything right.

Then I save the final product as a GIF.

Questions?

--Baloo

------------------
Christ is coming soon.
Look busy.
www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Baloo
Curmudgeon-in-Chief
Member # 5

 - posted      Profile for Baloo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There are four new images of the Friendship. Two of these images are "Artist's concept" images rendered in 3-D by Darrell Lawrence (WarriorDL). The other two represent the ship as it "actually appeared" during it's service life. These last two images were rendered in 3-D by David Bruha (Salek).

--Baloo

------------------
My karma ran over your dogma.
www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Fabrux
Epic Member
Member # 71

 - posted      Profile for Fabrux     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
All I can say is: Wow

------------------
"The Fabrux will never relent"
-Elim Garak

[This message has been edited by Fabrux (edited August 09, 1999).]

[This message has been edited by Fabrux (edited August 09, 1999).]


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Gaseous Anomaly
Senior Member
Member # 114

 - posted      Profile for Gaseous Anomaly     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The ship looked repugnant in Plan, Elevation, and End View, but the crossover into 3D has made a huge difference. It looks acceptable now, even great.

I think WarriorDL and Saleck deserve a congratulatory nod also.
Refreshing.
Like a particularly strong gust of wind when you're changing at the beach.
Well done all round.
*Stops gushing*

------------------
The unexplained phenomenon that crippled the U.S.S. Unimpeachable --
Gaseous Anomaly...
What anomalises gaseously.


Registered: Apr 1999  |  IP: Logged
Baloo
Curmudgeon-in-Chief
Member # 5

 - posted      Profile for Baloo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Just thought I'd fix the picture link.

------------------
When the chips are down, the buffalo is empty.
www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/8641/



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3