I had to make a few additions and extrapolations because of the spartan nature of the original drawings, the most obvious of which is the addition of a door.
posted
You know, something about submerging warp nacelles doesn't sit right with me... Then again, if they're vacuum-tight, I suppose water wouldn't hurt them.
-------------------- I haul cardboard and cardboard accessories
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Topher: You know, something about submerging warp nacelles doesn't sit right with me... Then again, if they're vacuum-tight, I suppose water wouldn't hurt them.
Interestingly, an early draft of "Starship Down" [DS9] called for the Defiant to go down on a water world; later the idea was revised to the gas giant one that was actually filmed.
Registered: Dec 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
Nice schematics, Rev. But even with the added details this isn't a very credible ship. It sure as hell doesn't look particular aquatic. I think the shuttles in TAS are generally pretty bad.
(Note: The emblems says "shipsyards")
-------------------- When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum
Registered: Oct 1999
| IP: Logged
EdipisReks
Ex-Member
posted
the top view kinda looks like the snowspeeder from tESB. i like the design, myself. kinda cooky.
IP: Logged
quote: Nice schematics, Rev. But even with the added details this isn't a very credible ship. It sure as hell doesn't look particular aquatic. I think the shuttles in TAS are generally pretty bad.
I agree, but like I said, it was done at a request.
quote: (Note: The emblems says "shipsyards")
Considering the whole thing took me only one hour from start to finish (schmatics & logo) I think I did fairly well in the error department.
posted
Reverend, great job on the design. I am really impressed. Are you going to make a more detailed and corrected version? What program do you use to design these wonderful ships?
"Set a course that is straight and true." - Capt. Hunter Star Trek: Nova
Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged