Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Ships of "Court-Martial" (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Ships of "Court-Martial"
colin
Active Member
Member # 217

 - posted      Profile for colin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

Chapter 1, 001.39, on the DVD of this
episode the ship list can be seen clearly.
The registries are:
NCC-1708
NCC-1831
NCC-1703
NCC-1672
NCC-1664
NCC-1697
NCC-1701
NCC-1718
NCC-1685
NCC-1700

A majority of these ship's registries can be identified with known ships.
NCC-1831 USS Intrepid
NCC-1703 USS Hood
NCC-1672 USS Exeter
NCC-1664 USS Excalibur
NCC-1697 USS Essex
NCC-1701 USS Enterprise
NCC-1700 USS Constitution

The other three are unidentified.

An idea
In the late 2250's or early 2260's, the Miranda Class starship is commissioned. One of the first ships of this class is the USS Lantree NCC-1837. She served Starfleet for over a hundred years when she is destroyed by the USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D. At this point of her career, she is downrated to a Class 6 carrier.

I understand that the USS Carolina is identified as a Daedalus Class starship in the Omnipedia because of her presumed function-that of a freighter.
An interpretation of this vessel's career based on Mr. Okuda's facts. She is commissioned in the 2160's and serves to 2196 when her class is retired. Decades later, she is refitted to the position of a freighter and is serving Starfleet in that capacity in 2266. When viewed with the USS Lantree's career and the perceived facts of the Daedalus Class, this may make sense.
However, a major issue arises. Why would a freighter patrol the Neutral Zone? This is the stated position of this ship in "Friday's Child".

Based on the available evidence now at hand, I believe the USS Carolina could be a Miranda Class starship possibly with one of the registries mentioned above. (The registry of the USS Miranda is not known.) She is not identified as a Constitution Class starship in the Making of Star Trek.

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory

[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited March 04, 2000).]


Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
The359
The bitch is back
Member # 37

 - posted      Profile for The359     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
NCC-1708 I believe was supposed to be NCC-1709 for the USS Lexington, or vice-versa.

Also, the USS Intrepid should be NCC-1631, not NCC-1831. It's possible that there are two seperate ships, or that the Encyclopedia was right all along, and USS Intrepid should have been NCC-1831.

And, are you sure that is the entire list? Because, I recall there being an NCC-1665, NCC-1667, NCC-1705, and NCC-1710 (which belongs to USS Kongo)

------------------
"The things hollow--it goes on forever--and--oh my God!--it's full of stars!" -David Bowman's last transmission back to Earth, 2001: A Space Odyssey

The 359 Webpage


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
colin
Active Member
Member # 217

 - posted      Profile for colin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is the complete list. USS Intrepid is NCC-1831.

The other registries come from a time when dvds were not available and the quality of the screen capture varied.

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory


Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Are you absolutely certain it says 1831 on screen? I mean, all the other numbers are 16xx and 17xx, and the Encyclopedia repeatedly suggests that the Intrepid was NCC-1631, only saying 1831 once.

------------------
"Can't shake the devil's hand and say you're only kidding."
-They Might Be Giants, "Your Racist Friend"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
colin
Active Member
Member # 217

 - posted      Profile for colin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I reviewed the scene in question repeatedly. I will modified my statements. The first registry is NCC-1709, not NCC-1708. As for the registry NCC-1831, I stand by my original position. The second number is clearly a eight with the "sides" closed and a line appearing midway connecting the "sides". Further, the sixes have a small separation on the right hand side which is missing from the NCC-1831. This refutes the encyclopedia. If others have the dvd, please check for the accuracy of my statements.

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory


Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
So regardless of what ship names we assign to these registries, it would seem that 1800-range registries were in use in Starfleet in the mid-2260s. That gives at least some support to the idea that the Mirandas we see could be refitted versions of TOS era designs...

Interesting how there are five numbers in the "traditional" Constitution range, a bit over 1700, four numbers just below that, and one number in the 1800s. The curiously small range of the numbers makes one think that there is something to the concept that these all are ships of the same class.

Then again, the small range of numbers might be because ships of roughly similar design age are likely to enter a period of refitting and upgrading at the same time. But the Enterprise is on that list as well - and she was only in for random repairs, not scheduled refitting.

Also, it's worth noting that a solid brass plate on the wall probably isn't the likeliest way to list ships currently docked. The list would have to be about something that ties together all those ships more or less permanently.

What WAS that brass plate about? Was there any header, any explanation of the contents? Does Frank have a screencap?

Timo Saloniemi


Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Maybe it was a computer monitor made to look like a brass plate. Maybe it was one of those screen savers that takes what's already on the screen and does stuff to it. :-)

------------------
Homer: "I can see what's happening. They did it to Jesus, and now they're doing it to me."
Marge: "Are you comparing yourself to our lord?!"
Homer: "Well, in bowling ability..."
-The Simpsons


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Aethelwer
Frank G
Member # 36

 - posted      Profile for Aethelwer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'll try getting an image if I get the DVD, which I hope to do.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"He's Satan. And not the good kind. I hate him. If there is a god, I hope Jebus has him fry in hell." - DT, in reference to me


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Laz1701
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
In tech fandom, classes such as the Coventry and Surya were direct precursors of the Miranda. So the tech fandom timeline goes, these were refitted as Avenger class, and Avenger class ships were refitted as Miranda.

------------------
The Starship Encyclopedia


IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Of course, in actual Trek, they don't seem to do this, meaning that they would all be called Miranda.

------------------
Homer: "I can see what's happening. They did it to Jesus, and now they're doing it to me."
Marge: "Are you comparing yourself to our lord?!"
Homer: "Well, in bowling ability..."
-The Simpsons


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
But since the Surya NCCs are higher than those of the Miranda class Lantree, one could easily say that there was a TOS-style Miranda class that preceded the Surya class, and both of these (sub)classes were subsequently refitted to a Reliant-style configuration, including the Avenger and Cyane and Endurance and whatnot subclasses.

Since USS Miranda would be the most senior of the ships (at NCC-1833, probably, so as not to contradict the other fanfic regos), Starfleet would pull the same trick they did with the refitted Constitutions, i.e. call all the modernized subclasses by the common name Miranda.

Of course, one could counter-argue that the Constitution isn't necessarily the oldest ship in the Constitution class (since she isn't the lowest-numbered), so the Miranda need not be, either. But I feel it would be simplest to assume that USS Miranda, NX-1833, already existed during TOS...

Timo Saloniemi


Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Of course, one could also argue that the Constitution must be the lowest-numbered of its class, and, hence, there was a predecessor to the 1700. I still don't see why everyone finds that such a difficult idea to accept...

------------------
Homer: "I can see what's happening. They did it to Jesus, and now they're doing it to me."
Marge: "Are you comparing yourself to our lord?!"
Homer: "Well, in bowling ability..."
-The Simpsons


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Dane Simri
Member
Member # 272

 - posted      Profile for Dane Simri     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If there was a pre-TOS-era Miranda counterpart, I bet it looked just like Baloo's "Pre-Oberth Research Frigate" in the DA&C Forum.

------------------
Dane

"Mathematicians have long held that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually reproduce the collected wisdom of the human race. Now, thanks to the internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Silensky


Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Spike
Pathetic Vampire
Member # 322

 - posted      Profile for Spike     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The Constitution has 1700. Why do other Constitution-Class-ships have lower numbers? The Starfleet Technical Manual gives numbers from 1700 to 1711 for the Constitution-Class. This sounds much better.

------------------
"No matter where you go, there you are."


Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs
astronauts gotta get paid
Member # 239

 - posted      Profile for Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It sounds better, but isn't, because the Technical Manual is not canon, and has been contradicted many, many times.

------------------
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education."
-Mark Twain


Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3