Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » A little help and corrections. Please not this is long. (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: A little help and corrections. Please not this is long.
Akira
Member
Member # 850

 - posted      Profile for Akira     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Do you all think these are about right?
Please let me know of any corrections thats should be made.

2284 USS Constellation NX-1974 is Comm.
USS Reliant is Destroyed 8100
8130.3
ST2
2285

USS Enterprise 1701 is Destroyed
USS Excelsior NX-2000/NCC-2000 Is Comm.
USS Ingram NCC-2001 Is Comm.
USS Jenolan NCC-2010 Is Comm.
USS ??????? NCC-2010-A Is Comm.
USS Nash NCC-2010-B Is Comm.
USS Korolev NCC-2014 is Comm.
USS Challenger NCC-2032 is Comm.
USS Ahwahnee NCC-2048 Is Comm.
USS Repulse NCC-2544 Is Comm.
USS Roosevelt NCC-2573 is Comm.
USS Valkyrie NCC-2590 is Comm.
USS Hathaway NCC-2593 Is Comm. 8201.3
8205.5

2600 ST3

2286 USS Enterprise 1701-A is Comm.
USS Aveley NCC-2543 is Comm.
USS Cyane NCC-1890 is Comm.
USS Repose NCC-1891
USS Balthasar NCC-1892 is Comm.
USS Tecumseh NCC-1893 is Comm. 8390.0 ST4 2900
2287 USS Magellan NCC-3069 is Comm. 8454.1 ST5 3200
2288 USS Ki Rin NCC-2539 is Comm.
USS Savannah NCC-1894 is Comm.
USS ???????? NCC-1895 is Comm.
USS Reprisal NCC-1896 is Comm.
USS Toresta NCC-1897 is Comm. 8631 3500
2289 USS Sumter NCC-1898 is Comm.
USS Auguste NCC-1899 is Comm. 8809 3800
2290 USS Gettysburg NCC-3890 is Comm. 8987 4100 Starships officially follow the reg. change of 2278
2291 9163 4600
2292 9340 5100
2293 USS Enterprise 1701-A is Decomm. 9521.6 ST6 5600
2294 USS Enterprise 1701-B is Launched 9600 6100
2295 USS LaSalle NCC-6203 is Comm.
USS Arcos NCC-6237 is Comm.
USS Enterprise 1701-B Is Comm. 9715 6600
2296 9800 7100
2297 9900 7600
2298 USS Cochrane NCC-8000 is Comm. 10000 8100
2299 11000 8600
2300 12000 9100
2301 USS Victory NCC-9754 is Comm. 13000 9800
2302 USS Hermes NCC-10376 is Comm.
USS Ambassador NX-10521 is Comm.
USS Horatio NCC-10532 is Comm. 14000 10617
2303 USS Ajax NCC-11574 is Comm.
USS Agamemnon NCC-11638 is Comm.
USS Gage NCC-11672 is Comm. 15000 11948
2304 SS Odin NGL-12535 is Comm.
USS Clement NCC-12537 16000 13279
2305 USS (Miranda) NCC-13471 Is Comm.
USS Okinawa NCC-13958 is Comm.
USS Berlin NCC-14232 is Comm.
USS Lexington NCC-14427 is Comm.
USS Fearless NCC-14598 is Comm. 17000 14610
2306 USS Tecumseh NCC-14934 is Comm. 18000 15941
2307 19000 17272
2308 T'Pau NSP-17938 is Comm.
USS Potemkin NCC-18253 is Comm. 20000 18603
2309 SS Vico NAR-18834 is Comm.
USS Yosemite NCC-19002 is Comm.
USS Tripoli NCC-19386 is Comm. 21000 19934
2310 USS Valiant NCC-20000 is Comm.
USS Fleming NCC-20316 is Comm.
USS Drake NCC-20381 is Comm.
USS Brattain NCC-21166 is Comm.
USS Enterprise 1701-B Is Decomm. ?
USS Enterprise 1701-C Is Comm.?

22519.5 21264

This is more than likely right

 I done this because the C did not have all the upgrades as other Amb�s did
2311 USS Tian An Men NCC-21382 is Comm. 23000 23076
2312 24000 24895
2313 USS Valdemar NCC-26198 is Comm.
USS Zhukov NCC-26136 is Comm.
USS Yamaguchi NCC-26510 is Comm.
USS Excalibur NCC-26517 is Comm.
USS Exeter NCC-26531 is Comm.
USS Gandhi NCC-26632 is Comm. 25000 26714
2314 USS Adelphi NCC-26849 is Comm. 26000 28533
2315 USS Raman NCC-29487 is Comm. 27000 30352
2316 USS Majestic NCC-31060 is Comm.
USS Bonestell NCC-31600 is Comm.
USS ShirKahr NCC-31905 is Comm.
USS Nautilus NCC-31910 is Comm.
USS Saratoga NCC-31911 is Comm. 28000 32171
2317 (U)SS Raven NAR-32450 is Comm.
USS Zapata NCC-33184 is Comm. 29000 33990
2318 USS Havana NCC-34043 is Comm.
USS Livingston NCC-34099 is Comm.
USS Istanbul NCC-34851 (It�s a joke) is Comm.
USS Constantinople NCC-34852 is Comm. 30000 35809
2319 USS Trieste NCC-37124 is Comm. 31000 37628
2320 USS Wellington NCC-28473 is Comm.
USS Sarajevo NCC-38529 is Comm.
USS Intrepid NCC-38907 is Comm.
USS Crockett NCC-38955 is Comm.
USS Malinche NCC-38997 is Comm. 32000 39447
2321 USS Gorkon NCC-40521 is Comm. 33000 41266
2323 USS Centaur NCC-42043 is Comm.
USS Fredrickson NCC-42111 is Comm.
USS Cairo NCC-42136 is Comm.
USS Kongo NCC-42173 is Comm.
(USS) Raging Queen NCC-42284 is Comm.
USS Charleston NCC-42285 is Comm.
USS Hood NCC-42296 is Comm.
USS Lakota NCC-42768 is Comm.
USS Grissom NCC-42857 is Comm.
USS Al-Batani NCC-42995 is Comm. 34000 43085
2324
2324 Cont. USS Valley Forge NCC-43305 is Comm.
USS Wyoming NCC-43730 is Comm.
USS Lalo NCC-43837 is Comm. 35000 44904
2325 USS Aries NCC-45167 is Comm.
USS Maryland NCC-45109 is Comm.
USS Hornet NCC-45231 is Comm.
USS Curry NCC-45617 is Comm. 36000/0000 46723 Stardate starts to change over and is complete by 2336
2326 37000/1000 48542
2327 USS Biko NCC-50331 is Comm. 38000/2000 50361
2328 SS Milan NDT-50863 is Comm.
USS Crazy Horse NCC-50446 is Comm.
USS Appalachia NCC-52136 is Comm. 39000/3000 52180
2329 USS Pegasus NCC-53847 is Comm.
(U)SS Tsiolkovsky NCC-53911 is Comm.?
40291.7/4000
54006 More Than Likely Right
2330 41000/5000 54500
2331 USS Denver NCC-54927 is Comm.
USS Nobel NCC-55012 is Comm. 42000/6000 55075
2332 43000/7000 55651
2333 44000/8000 56227
2334 45000/9000 56803
2335 USS Rutledge NCC-57295 is Comm.
USS Chekov NCC-57302 is Comm. 10000 57379 New Stardate Takes Effect
2336 USS Portland NCC-57418 is Comm.
USS Armstrong NCC-57537 is Comm.
USS Kearsarge NCC-57566 is Comm.
USS Buran NCC-57580 is Comm. 11000 57955
2337 USS Hokkaido is Comm. 12000 58537
2338 USS Pasteur NCC-58925 is Comm. 13000 59107
2339 USS Goddard NCC-59621 is Comm.
USS Cochrane NCC-59318 is Comm. 14000 59683
2340 USS Princeton NCC-59804 is Comm.
USS Honshu NCC-60205 is Comm. 15000 60259
2341 USS Farragut NCC-60597 is Comm. 16000 60835
2342 USS Yorktown NCC-61137 is Comm. 17000 61411
2343 USS Monitor NCC-61826 is Comm.
USS Merrimack NCC-61827 is Comm.
USS Lexington NCC-61832 is Comm.
USS Yeager NCC-61947 is Comm.
USS Proxima NCC-61952 is Comm. 18000 61987
2344 USS Enterprise 1701-C is Lost
USS Hera NCC-62006 is Comm.
USS Melbourne NCC-62043 is Comm.
USS Bellerophon NCC-62048 is Comm.
USS Tolstoy NCC-62095 is Comm.
USS Akagi NCC-62158 is Comm.
USS Akira NCC-62497 is Comm. 19000 62563
2345 USS Renegade NCC-63102 is Comm. 20000 63139
2346 USS Rabin NCC-63293 is Comm.
USS Tunderchild NCC-63549 is Comm. 21000 63715
2345 USS Brattain NCC-21166 is Comm. maybe?? 22519.5 64291 Recomm. Date? More likely 2310
2346 23000 64867
2347 USS Budapest NCC-64923 is Comm.
USS Phoenix NCC-65420 is Launched
USS Kyushu NCC-65491 is Comm. 24000 65443
2348 USS Thomas Paine NCC-65530 is Comm.
USS Spector NCC-65549 is Comm.
USS Yeager NCC-65674 is Comm. 25000 66019
2349 26000 66595
2350 USS Ulysses NCC-66808 is Comm.
USS Liberator NCC-67016 is Comm. 27000 67171
2351 28000 67747
2352 29000 68323
2353 USS Concord NCC-68711 is Comm.
USS Firebrand NCC-68723 is Comm.
USS Prokofiev NCC-68814 is Comm. 30000 68899
2354 31000 69475
2355 USS Yellowstone NCC-70073 is Comm. 32000 70051
2356 USS Leeds NCC-70352 Is Comm. 33000 70627
2357 USS Galaxy NX-70637 is Comm. 34000 70879
2358 USS Bonchune NCC-70915 is Comm.
USS Drake NCC-70956 is Comm. 35000 70997
2359 USS Challenger NCC-71099 is Launched USS Prometheus NCC-71201 is Comm.
USS???? NCC-71325 is Comm. 36000 71190
2360 USS Ahwahnee NCC-71620 is Comm.
USS Jupiter NCC-71627 is Comm.
USS Endeavour NCC-71805 Is Comm.
USS Yamato NCC-71807 is Comm.
USS Odyssey NCC-71832 is Launched 37000 71833
2361 USS Venture NCC-71854 Is Launched 38000 71859
2362 USS Trinculo NCC-71867 is Launched 39000 71885
2363 USS Phoenix NCC-65420 is Comm. Late
(U)SS Tsiolkovsky NCC-53911 is Comm.?
USS Enterprise 1701-D Is Comm. 40250.5
40291.7
40759.5 71911 * see note
 Recomm. Date? More likely 2329

2364 41000 71937
2365 42000 71963
2366 USS Bradbury NX-72307 is Launched 43000 71989 39 Starship Destroyed
2367 USS Danube NX-72003 is Comm.
USS Southerland NCC-72015 is Comm. 44645.5?
44820.5 72020 Massive Starship Build up Begins
2368 USS Yangtze Kiang NCC-72453 is Comm.
USS Ganges NCC-72454 Is Comm.
USS Bradbury NX-72307 is Comm.
USS Shenandoah NCC-73024 is Comm.
USS Equinox NCC-72381 is Comm.
USS Mekong NCC-72617 is Comm.
USS Rhode Island NCC-72701 is Comm.
USS Orinoco NCC-72905 Is Comm.
USS Rubicon NCC-72936 is Comm. 45000 73110
2369 USS Volga NCC-73196 Is Comm.
USS Bozeman NCC-1941 Is Recomm. 46000 73305
2370 USS Ng NCC-73918 is Comm.
USS Elkins NCC-74121 is Comm.
USS Defiant NX-74205 is Comm.
USS Sovereign NX-74222/73811 is Comm.
USS Rio Grande NCC-74252 is Comm.
USS Yukon NCC-74602 is Comm.

47538.5 74650
2371 Jan.12th USS Voyager NCC-74656 is Comm. 48038.5 74881
2372 USS Enterprise 1701-E is Comm.
USS Valiant NCC-74210 is Comm. Late
USS Bellerophon NCC-74705 is Comm.
USS Yellowstone NX-74751 is Comm. 49027.5
49456.5
74789
2373 USS Prometheus NX-74913 is Comm. 50749.5 75034
2374 USS???? NCC-75227 is Comm. 51000
2375 USS Defiant NX-74205 is destroyed
USS Sao Paulo NCC-75633 is comm. but later renamed the USS Defiant NX-74205(-A)
52889.3 75678
2376 53000
2377 54000
2378 55000
2379 56000
2380 END OF STAR TREK NEW EPISODES  57000
2381 58000
2382 59000
2383 60000
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396

956//1631/1647/1657/1664/1672/1685/1684/1697/reclassified as Constitution phase 2 *note at bottom of page Cont.
These Ships were classified as a Different Class but Reclassified as a Constitution Class with old Registry�s hall numbers on the ship but given New Numbers to follow the Reclassifications. This is why you will see for example 1706/1672 For the USS Exeter.
USS Republic NCC-1371 Was just Classified as a Constitution Class Only
USS Phoenix NCC-65420 is Comm. Late due to Problems during Construction.

--------------------
Christopher
[email protected]
SR20Egg

Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fabrux
Epic Member
Member # 71

 - posted      Profile for Fabrux     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The first thing I see on this list that I don't agree with is the commissioning of the Ambassador with NX and the Horatio in the same year. We'll worry about the year of this later.

If I were SF Command, I would wait until the prototype of my new explorer class was past the testing stages and commissioned with a proper NCC before commissioning another ship of this class. Unless, of course, the Ambassador and the Horatio were dual prototypes like the Victory and the Excalibur in "Call To Arms"...

--------------------
I haul cardboard and cardboard accessories

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Akira
Member
Member # 850

 - posted      Profile for Akira     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Id say the that Ambassador was done with her shake down period and this commishoned the other ship so close to her.

--------------------
Christopher
[email protected]
SR20Egg

Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mark Nguyen
I'm a daddy now!
Member # 469

 - posted      Profile for Mark Nguyen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It has happened before that some things bypass a prototype phase and go straight to limited production. The Avro Arrow, for example, had five planes built at the same time for initial flight performance tests - and that was a radical design for its time. It's entirely possible that the Ambassador and Horatio were two members of an initial production batch. Maybe Starfleet had the sudden need for big Explorers, and lots of them?

Mark

--------------------
"This is my timey-wimey detector. Goes ding when there's stuff." - Doctor Who
The 404s - Improv Comedy | Mark's Starship Bridge Designs | Anime Alberta

Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Alternately, it may have been politically necessary to sign a deal for a number of ships simultaneously, so they all got similar NCCs. Yet only one was actually constructed, tested, and then cleared for mass production.

Applying this sort of logic would deprive us of the means to tie NCCs even roughly together with launch dates, though. But every now and then this excuse could indeed be used to get us out of a corner.

About the list: you suggest recommissioning instead of original commissioning for the Brattain. A good idea IMHO, but then you should use that for the Tsiolkovsky as well.

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Akira
Member
Member # 850

 - posted      Profile for Akira     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I beleave i did but i could be wrong. [Smile]

--------------------
Christopher
[email protected]
SR20Egg

Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
J
Active Member
Member # 608

 - posted      Profile for J     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Rarely do they build a prototype and not have a few sister ships on the line right behind it, especially when that prototype is meant to be the first of a long line of production ships. If they don't have a steady stream of ships ready to go after the prototype business goes bad.

--------------------
Later, J
_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _
The Last Person to post in the late Voyager Forum. Bashing both Voyager, Enterprise, and "The Bun" in one glorious post.

[email protected]
http://webj.cjb.net

Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Akira
Member
Member # 850

 - posted      Profile for Akira     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Can some one explane why they would make to ship so close together Reg. wise? If someone can give me a good reason i will change it but i still see them as being comm. really close together.

--------------------
Christopher
[email protected]
SR20Egg

Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Intruder1701
Member
Member # 880

 - posted      Profile for Intruder1701     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well maybe the ships with the close registries were sister ships, you know built side by side at the same time and were commissioned and launched on ths same day.

--------------------
"Who cares if we bomb a few hospitals, it just means we got them a second time" Warrant Officer Robert Clift, CVN-71 OEF

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
iam2xtreme
Member
Member # 836

 - posted      Profile for iam2xtreme         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Timo:
Alternately, it may have been politically necessary to sign a deal for a number of ships simultaneously, so they all got similar NCCs. Yet only one was actually constructed, tested, and then cleared for mass production.

Applying this sort of logic would deprive us of the means to tie NCCs even roughly together with launch dates, though. But every now and then this excuse could indeed be used to get us out of a corner.

I agree, I always thought that starships were assigned names and registrys when they are first commisioned to be built, hence the registry of the Prometheus.

--------------------
"Marge, trying is the first step towards failure!!" Homer

Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Dat
Huh?
Member # 302

 - posted      Profile for Dat     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The Prometheus also had the 749xx number. And the Defiant was 74205 while Voyager was 74656. We know that work started on Voyager before work started on Defiant. It's not always the case where a ship is named and numbered as soon as the contract is given.

--------------------
Is it Friday yet?

Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The problem w/ those examples is that they are all prototype ships. So the registries could be assigned at some other time, say, when the design starts being drawn, or when the project is first commissioned. It wouldn't necessarily be when the ship is ordered to actually be built.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Akira
Member
Member # 850

 - posted      Profile for Akira     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by TSN:
The problem w/ those examples is that they are all prototype ships. So the registries could be assigned at some other time, say, when the design starts being drawn, or when the project is first commissioned. It wouldn't necessarily be when the ship is ordered to actually be built.

posted September 13, 2002 11:17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the way they worked out to Stardate Comm. and what year they fall by dividing the numbers and this how i cam up with this. I think the Prom. is the 70000 number & NOT the 50000 since its more like voyager and not the firebrand and such.
Do you all think these are about right?
Please let me know of any corrections thats should be made.

2343 USS Monitor NCC-61826 is Comm.
USS Merrimack NCC-61827 is Comm.
USS Lexington NCC-61832 is Comm.
USS Yeager NCC-61947 is Comm.
USS Proxima NCC-61952 is Comm. 18000 61987
2344 USS Enterprise 1701-C is Lost
USS Hera NCC-62006 is Comm.
USS Melbourne NCC-62043 is Comm.
USS Bellerophon NCC-62048 is Comm.
USS Tolstoy NCC-62095 is Comm.
USS Akagi NCC-62158 is Comm.
USS Akira NCC-62497 is Comm. 19000 62563
2345 USS Renegade NCC-63102 is Comm. 20000 63139
2346 USS Rabin NCC-63293 is Comm.
USS Tunderchild NCC-63549 is Comm. 21000 63715
2345 USS Brattain NCC-21166 is Comm. maybe?? 22519.5 64291 Recomm. Date? More likely 2310
2346 23000 64867
2347 USS Budapest NCC-64923 is Comm.
USS Phoenix NCC-65420 is Launched
USS Kyushu NCC-65491 is Comm. 24000 65443
2348 USS Thomas Paine NCC-65530 is Comm.
USS Spector NCC-65549 is Comm.
USS Yeager NCC-65674 is Comm. 25000 66019
2349 26000 66595
2350 USS Ulysses NCC-66808 is Comm.
USS Liberator NCC-67016 is Comm. 27000 67171
2351 28000 67747
2352 29000 68323
2353 USS Concord NCC-68711 is Comm.
USS Firebrand NCC-68723 is Comm.
USS Prokofiev NCC-68814 is Comm. 30000 68899
2354 31000 69475
2355 USS Yellowstone NCC-70073 is Comm. 32000 70051
2356 USS Leeds NCC-70352 Is Comm. 33000 70627
2357 USS Galaxy NX-70637 is Comm. 34000 70879
2358 USS Bonchune NCC-70915 is Comm.
USS Drake NCC-70956 is Comm. 35000 70997
2359 USS Challenger NCC-71099 is Launched USS Prometheus NCC-71201 is Comm.
USS???? NCC-71325 is Comm. 36000 71190
2360 USS Ahwahnee NCC-71620 is Comm.
USS Jupiter NCC-71627 is Comm.
USS Endeavour NCC-71805 Is Comm.
USS Yamato NCC-71807 is Comm.
USS Odyssey NCC-71832 is Launched 37000 71833
2361 USS Venture NCC-71854 Is Launched 38000 71859
2362 USS Trinculo NCC-71867 is Launched 39000 71885
2363 USS Phoenix NCC-65420 is Comm. Late
(U)SS Tsiolkovsky NCC-53911 is Comm.?
USS Enterprise 1701-D Is Comm. 40250.5
40291.7
40759.5 71911 * see note
 Recomm. Date? More likely 2329

2364 41000 71937
2365 42000 71963
2366 USS Bradbury NX-72307 is Launched 43000 71989 39 Starship Destroyed
2367 USS Danube NX-72003 is Comm.
USS Southerland NCC-72015 is Comm. 44645.5?
44820.5 72020 Massive Starship Build up Begins
2368 USS Yangtze Kiang NCC-72453 is Comm.
USS Ganges NCC-72454 Is Comm.
USS Bradbury NX-72307 is Comm.
USS Shenandoah NCC-73024 is Comm.
USS Equinox NCC-72381 is Comm.
USS Mekong NCC-72617 is Comm.
USS Rhode Island NCC-72701 is Comm.
USS Orinoco NCC-72905 Is Comm.
USS Rubicon NCC-72936 is Comm. 45000 73110
2369 USS Volga NCC-73196 Is Comm.
USS Bozeman NCC-1941 Is Recomm. 46000 73305
2370 USS Ng NCC-73918 is Comm.
USS Elkins NCC-74121 is Comm.
USS Defiant NX-74205 is Comm.
USS Sovereign NX-74222/73811 is Comm.
USS Rio Grande NCC-74252 is Comm.
USS Yukon NCC-74602 is Comm.

47538.5 74650
2371 Jan.12th USS Voyager NCC-74656 is Comm. 48038.5 74881
2372 USS Enterprise 1701-E is Comm.
USS Valiant NCC-74210 is Comm. Late
USS Bellerophon NCC-74705 is Comm.
USS Yellowstone NX-74751 is Comm. 49027.5
49456.5
74789
2373 USS Prometheus NX-74913 is Comm. 50749.5 75034
2374 USS???? NCC-75227 is Comm. 51000
2375 USS Defiant NX-74205 is destroyed
USS Sao Paulo NCC-75633 is comm. but later renamed the USS Defiant NX-74205(-A)
52889.3 75678

--------------------
Christopher
[email protected]
SR20Egg

Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Dat
Huh?
Member # 302

 - posted      Profile for Dat     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Okay, maybe using the Defiant with Voyager wasn't good. But you can instead use Valiant with 74210 and Voyager.

--------------------
Is it Friday yet?

Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
J
Active Member
Member # 608

 - posted      Profile for J     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I wish people would stop using that 5**** for the Prometheus--- I'll be 100% honest:

IT IS WRONG!

A mistake of VFX dudes, just like the Yamato's E or F or whatever it was.

OK it's out of my system now.

--------------------
Later, J
_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _
The Last Person to post in the late Voyager Forum. Bashing both Voyager, Enterprise, and "The Bun" in one glorious post.

[email protected]
http://webj.cjb.net

Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3