Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » Other Television Shows » Enterprise and the ratings (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   
Author Topic: Enterprise and the ratings
Dukhat
Hater of Stock Footage
Member # 341

 - posted      Profile for Dukhat     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Every once in awhile I find myself going over to the TrekBBS to read some posts. Once I get through the tons of the more inane, ridiculous posts, I sometimes come across one or two that are actually intelligent & coherent.

The other day I came across a post asking about Enterprise's ratings. Although most of the people didn't really have much info about this, I was wondering if perhaps someone here could enlighten me. Here's my question:

I have a friend who works for an advertizing agency in Washington, DC. I asked him how Enterprise's ratings were. He told me that in comparison to the major networks, Enterprise was at the very bottom. But in relation to other UPN shows, it was on top. So does this actually mean that a show which basically nobody is watching (in relation to the network shows) can literally stay on the air for seven years just because it's on UPN?

--------------------
"A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Enterprise is ratings-proof, because it has a built-in audience, does well demographically, and sells widgets and doodads. It's also going to attract media attention to a much greater degree than anything else the network could put on, because Star Trek is enough of a cultural phenomenon even today to warrant the coverage from things like Entertainment Weekly or what have you.

It isn't, incidently, consistently at the bottom of the heap. (Though, of course, being on UPN, and thus having a smaller market penetration, it is close to it.)

From time to time, the Sci-Fi Channel news service will put up ratings for a number of different SF/F shows, (even ones vaguely related, and there isn't much consistency [some weeks Alias is on it, some weeks it isn't, etc.]). I was trying to keep track for awhile.

Anyway, of the little networks, which constitute UPN and Warner Bros., mostly (Fox is too big, I think, though their SF/F shows haven't really been outperforming the competition. And Pax isn't even worthy of my attention.), the highest rated program (which almost never gets above a 4.0) tends to rotate between Buffy, Enterprise, and Smallville.

Of course, my record stops just before the end of the first season, so I couldn't tell you how Enterprise is performing this year.

But, as I said, in this case, the raw numbers aren't what's really important to the networks. Consider how much of a cultural phenomenon something like the Sopranos is, despite the fact that even the worst post-Friends show that no one ever talked about had more viewers.

In my next post, Firefly!

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
IMO, the reason for the "bottom" ratings is the fact that UPN is a cut-rate network pretender. Paramount is satisfied enough with the results, but won't do anything whenever their shows get slammed in the Nielsen reports.

Not that any of the recent Trek shows would turn out any better on another network, probably -- because none of the *real* national networks have any real stake in Trek and therefore wouldn't give it the attention necessary to really make it succeed. And the syndication market has dried up since everyone jumped on the bandwagon after TNG.

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Incidently, their most recent genre ratings, and Enterprise is indeed at the bottom of the heap. Note that quality appears to have little to do with it, if the most-watched show on the list tells us anything.

SHOW HHR
Touched by an Angel 5.3
Smallville 4.8
Alias 4.4
John Doe 3.9
Buffy 3.0
Firefly 2.9
Birds of Prey 2.8
Angel 2.6
Charmed 2.6
Enterprise 2.5

Source: Nielsen Galaxy Report, 10/21/02 - 10/27/02

I don't know what shows were showing new episodes and which were showing reruns that week, though, which seems like it would be important.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You know what's really sad? "Enterprise" is doing even worse than "Firefly" and "Andromeda," but it's still perceived as the strongest show for some reason...

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Obi Juan
Who's your master?
Member # 90

 - posted      Profile for Obi Juan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by MinutiaeMan:
And the syndication market has dried up since everyone jumped on the bandwagon after TNG.

The syndication market that TNG created in the first place!

How many successful non-tabloid new-syndicated shows were there before TNG? ZERO

In the 80s (before 87 anyway) syndicated = crap. We're talking very low budget sitcoms that could only get aired early Sunday morning right after Dr. Landow finished discussing yeast infections for a half hour. Such hits as The New Monkees, The New Leave it to Beaver, and Harry and the Hendersons.

Oh yeah, I thought TNG was going to be a real winner when I heard it was going to be syndicated.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
The_Tom
recently silent
Member # 38

 - posted      Profile for The_Tom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Simon: The one you cite is a rerun rating.

http://enterprise.psiphi.org/frames/ref/ratings/

(I should add that a good 90% of the people online who attempt to draw broad conclusions from the ratings do so in a terribly hamfisted fashion and have zero knowledge of how the entertainment industry works. Basically, the easiest policy to follow about drawing firm conclusions from ratings is don't.)

Obi: It should be added that syndication has very rapidly shifted back to being solely a place where TV shows are made for the purpose of being stuffed in as stopgaps on Saturday nights and Sunday afternoons. With the obvious exception of DS9, I doubt anything syndicated since 1994 could really be seen as intended as compelling drama.

--------------------
"I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
even though i think the show is drek, and dont watch it anymore, do you realize how much cash i've shelled out on ENT related items? they're making their money on phase pistols, hats magazines and the like.

i even bought the novels, on the hopes that even though the show was shitty, the novels might have some redeeming value.. the novels are 3 or 4 times shittier than the show. they even have cheap typesetting, proofreading and spellchecking, something i thought wouldn't be an issue to a publishing giant like simon/schuster and a licensing giant like paramount.

but guess what: they're cheating people out of cash, ratings (and quality) don't matter

the suits do look cool though.. my captain's togs get all the chicks at parties. or at least two at a time, but who needs more?

--------------------
"Are you worried that your thoughts are not quite.. clear?"

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mikey T
Driven
Member # 144

 - posted      Profile for Mikey T     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well I've stopped watching Enterprise but I do occasionally have friends tell me interesting tidbits about how the red alert thing came about. Still, I'd rather spend money on the TNG era or the TOS era of Star Trek than on Enterprise era stuff.

--------------------
"It speaks to some basic human needs: that there is a tomorrow, it's not all going to be over with a big splash and a bomb, that the human race is improving, that we have things to be proud of as humans."
-Gene Roddenberry about Star Trek

Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged
Veers
You first
Member # 661

 - posted      Profile for Veers         Edit/Delete Post 
What kind of ratings did DS9 get?

--------------------
Meh

Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well Emissary was the highest rating pilot episode of all time when it was aired. Then they dropped a little, then a little more, then a little more, picked up a bit, then dropped, stayed same, stayed same. Roughly (for the seven seasons)

[Smile]

Andrew

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by The Mike from C.A.P.T.A.I.N.:

ibut guess what: they're cheating people out of cash, ratings (and quality) don't matter.

Yes, damn them for kidnapping your family, locking them in a room and then threatening to shoot them in the head unless you buy The Newest Crossover Series Of Novels Where The Captains Get Together And Eat The Defiant. Or whatever.

--------------------
Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Mucus
Senior Member
Member # 24

 - posted      Profile for Mucus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll never forgive the producers... for the death of my boy.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Kosh
Perpetual Member
Member # 167

 - posted      Profile for Kosh     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:

What kind of ratings did DS9 get?

I think it averaged somewhere around 5.0 for most of it's run. Hercules and Xena did about the same, till Herc went off, then Xena's rateings dropped.

--------------------
Sparky::
Think!
Question Authority, Authoritatively.
“Believe nothing of what you hear, and only half of what you see.”
EMSparks


Shalamar:
To save face, keep lower half shut.


Registered: Jun 1999  |  IP: Logged
Matrix
AMEAN McAvoy
Member # 376

 - posted      Profile for Matrix     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally from what I can see now and then, I like it. For the most part, it's not the general public getting turned off, but the Trekkie fans...

--------------------
Matrix
If you say so
If you want so
Then do so

Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3