Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » TNG in HD (Page 2)

  This topic comprises 29 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  27  28  29   
Author Topic: TNG in HD
o2
Active Member
Member # 907

 - posted      Profile for o2     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Dukhat:
quote:
Originally posted by o2:

I'm pretty sure that this test disc will not be VFX-heavy out of budget reasons.

Why? The whole point of the test would be to determine if the HD upconversion and updated VFX effects are worth doing.


Because this project is driven by marketing people and not by technicians. They will most probably choose episodes which cover all technical aspects as space shots, beaming effects, matte paintings, laser fire in both life action and space scenes and ‘Data sitting in front of the view screen’, but they will not choose very effect heavy episodes in order to keep the budget low. There is still a chance that the outcome is superb however not enough people are buying it. This 4-episode blu ray is a test balloon to see if people are willing to pay again for TNG. And unless they know the answer they will not spend too much money on it. My assumption is that they will focus on ‘good’ TNG episodes with great stories.
Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fabrux
Epic Member
Member # 71

 - posted      Profile for Fabrux     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Maybe if they didn't make the seasons so bloody expensive they'd sell more. I mean, TNG on DVD has been out for how many years and they're still $60+ a season. WTF

--------------------
I haul cardboard and cardboard accessories

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Reverend
Based on a true story...
Member # 335

 - posted      Profile for Reverend     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by MinutiaeMan:
6. I remember reading somewhere that TNG was shot on film but edited directly on video. So not only would they have to convert every effects scene, but they'd also have to re-edit the entire episode to put it in HD.

Actually I think having all the footage on film is a good thing in his case. Any attempt to replace VFX and not have it look crap would require the best possible print to be scanned into a digital editing suit. Needless to say, film stock is is probably going to be much easier to blow up for HD than a second or third gen video transfer. Plus of course you'd need the raw footage to re-composite any new VFX regardless. Re-editing and re-scoring the entire episode is, I think a given in this case.

I think TOS-R got away with it because the limitations of 60's technology on a shoestring budget meant the shots they were replacing were pretty straight forward and took up relatively little screen time. TNG had a *LOT* more VFX elements per episode.

I'd be surprised if it goes ahead, but if any franchise can afford to have this much money thrown at it, it's Star Trek. Shows like Babylon 5 on the other hand don't have a snowball's chance in hell of getting the HD treatment. Building a whole new stable of HD quality assets and textures, re-rendering all that footage on it's own would be prohibitively expensive, never mind all the video and audio remastering legwork.

I wonder if it might be a better idea for them to work backwards. Start with Enterprise (assuming it's not already HD quality) then tackling Voyager and DS9. The digital assents are more likely to be around and a lot of the original model builders and animators are still in the business.

--------------------
Dark Knight Adventures & Batman Beyond:Stripped - DeviantArt Gallery
================================
...what we demand is a total absence of solid facts!

Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
o2
Active Member
Member # 907

 - posted      Profile for o2     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Charles Capps:
And if it isn't, http://imgur.com/

Thanks for the hint. Is there anything to consider before I post copyrighted material?
Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Also, the first three seasons of Enterprise are already in HD. You can get 'em on iTunes. (Dunno why season 4 is only SD.)

But I'm still highly skeptical of any of the other shows in HD. Upgrading TOS made sense because the effects were so old and so low-res, it was a major improvement. But you're going to get diminishing returns on TNG, and even less from DS9 and VOY. And each one of those shows went for 7 seasons. It took more than two years to remaster the 3 seasons of TOS. Unless they could massively speed up the process, you're talking a 7-year project to remaster TNG, DS9, and VOY. And for what?

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Reverend
Based on a true story...
Member # 335

 - posted      Profile for Reverend     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^BluRay sales? It's a simple equation; if the cost of doing it (all expenditures included) is less than the expected sales revenue then they'll do it. If anything stretching it out over a decade is a bonus.

The reason the recent shows will be easier is that there's a good chance the digital assets still exist. Not just the models and textures (at least some of which may still be serviceable) but the scene and animation files too. Once you have those you just need to re-render the same scenes at a higher resolution.

...Probably not nearly that simple, but a hell of a lot more straight forward and less labour intensive than starting from scratch. Plus the live action footage shouldn't need remastering. The early seasons of TNG on the other hand looks decidedly VHS in quality.

This was exactly what the plan with Babylon 5. It was anticipated from the get-go that widescreen HD TV wasn't too far off so the whole show was shot in widescreen, with the intention to be able to come back latter and re-render and re-composite all the CG elements once the technology was available.

The reasons it didn't work are threefold. Firstly because Netter (and possibly someone else who's name escapes me) didn't want to spend a couple extra grand on a special monitor that'd allow Foundation Imaging to frame their shots for anything other than 4:3. Secondly when Netter Digital took over from FI, they basically trashed the digital assets because they didn't know what they were doing (IIRC they were mostly the least experienced team members at FI that were poached to run Netter's new company.) And thirdly, WB who were entrusted with all the assets after the show ended (at their insistence) promptly lost them and let rats eat the live action footage (no joke!)

With a bit of luck Paramount and it's employees have taken a bit more care with their property and such a project would at least be possible. I have no idea if it'd be profitable; that's for the bean counters to decide.

--------------------
Dark Knight Adventures & Batman Beyond:Stripped - DeviantArt Gallery
================================
...what we demand is a total absence of solid facts!

Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Possibly we'll see some "greatest Hits" package for an anniversary with updated effects- as a test of viability...

But I sorta doubt it.

Man, I'd kill to see First Contact in 3D on an IMAX screen though!

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
o2
Active Member
Member # 907

 - posted      Profile for o2     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That's a good point!

[irony on]

They have to release TNG on BluRay 2011/12 so they can sell us all seven seasons in 3D again afterwards.

[irony off]

Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
THey need to release TNG in HD with new effects to hype Abrams' dismantling of everything cerebral and non- Hollywood about Trek.

MORE EXPLOSIONS! MORE SEX! BIGGER STARSHIPS!

Fuck's sake.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
o2
Active Member
Member # 907

 - posted      Profile for o2     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There is some new street talk about the release of TNG on blu-ray over at thedigitalbits.com:

They expect 'Encounter at Farpoint' to be one of the episodes that will be on the sample disc.

I love to see the Hood fly by the Enterprise!

[ September 03, 2011, 06:08 AM: Message edited by: o2 ]

Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by o2:
that will be on the sample disc.

I love to see the Hood fly by the Enterprise!

Maybe they'll scale it correctly this time- which would be a great way to showcase how frickin huge the Galaxy class is.

And maybe we can get an actress to redo all of Marina Sirtis' godawful lines...(shudder)


And in later episodes, they could scale the Warbird correctly! And Spacedock! And everything!


But mostly, BOBW- we need clear shots of the destroyed ships as the Enterprise weaves it's way through the wreckage.

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Johnny
Senior Member
Member # 878

 - posted      Profile for Johnny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Jason Abbadon:
THey need to release TNG in HD with new effects to hype Abrams' dismantling of everything cerebral and non- Hollywood about Trek.

MORE EXPLOSIONS! MORE SEX! BIGGER STARSHIPS!

Fuck's sake.

Throwing boring diplomacy out of the window, Picard refers to all his enemies as "cupcake".

--------------------
deviantArt page | Online portfolio

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
o2
Active Member
Member # 907

 - posted      Profile for o2     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here is a list of the supposed first four episodes:

Encounter at Faipint (Part 1 + 2)
The inner Light
Sins of the Father

No comments right now...

Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Nim
The Aardvark asked for a dagger
Member # 205

 - posted      Profile for Nim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Good list. I don't blame them for choosing non-blowy-uppy episodes, HD embellishes more than phasers.
Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
To be honest. Season 1 has the poorest quality effects out of the entire series.

There's nothing really wrong with TIL and SOTF. Just HD it and that's it.

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 29 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  27  28  29   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3