Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Akira - Jaeger style... (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Akira - Jaeger style...
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Okay, if this particular point was already discussed, I'm sorry. For a while, I was having trouble keeping up w/ all the threads in here, so I may have missed some stuff.

Anyway, I was looking at something regarding what Alex Jaeger said of the Akira in the STMag. The thing that particularly interested me was his comment that the Aki's saucer was almost as large as a Sovvy's. Now, I did a little brief playing around w/ diagrams in Photoshop, and I figure, if the Aki's saucer (area viewed from the top) is not quite as large as a Sovvy's, the Aki is around 500m long. Whaddaya think?

It's three in the morning. I'm going to bed. When I get up in the mor�, er... afternoon, probably... I expect this subject to have been thoroughly discussed and settled. *L*

------------------
"Flying Thompson's Gazelle of the Yard!"
-Inspector Fox, the Arguement Clinic sketch, Monty Python's Flying Circus


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Michael Dracon
aka: NightWing or Altair
Member # 4

 - posted      Profile for Michael Dracon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I tried comparing the saucers on internal volume. Counting the deflector, I think 454m (from DS9 Tech. Manual I believe) is still pretty accurate.

------------------
"Isn't Y2K year 2048?? I mean last time I checked 1K was 1024.
Now that Y1.953125K, that's where the real problem lies..."

[This message was edited by Altair on June 07, 1999.]


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Aethelwer
Frank G
Member # 36

 - posted      Profile for Aethelwer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
(I shall now bring to attention my Akira length page.)

I believe Jaegar said that the Akira's saucer was almost as wide as the Sovereign's. That would make the Akira ~390m. No more than ~400m, and possibly smaller. (Comparison) Of course, in the show, the Akira has been ~340m anyway, as I mentioned above, and the show always overrides everything.

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
"Let's get those missiles ready to destroy the universe!" - TMBG

[This message was edited by The Shadow on June 07, 1999.]


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Bernd
Guy from Old Europe
Member # 6

 - posted      Profile for Bernd     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The deck count as well as the size comparison with the Sovereign escape pods yields ~440m.

------------------
"No, thanks. I've had enough. One more cup and I'll jump to warp." (Janeway, asked if she would like some coffee in "Once upon a Time")
www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Aethelwer
Frank G
Member # 36

 - posted      Profile for Aethelwer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
But, the escape pods aren't necessarily the same size.

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
"Let's get those missiles ready to destroy the universe!" - TMBG


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Davok
Member
Member # 143

 - posted      Profile for Davok     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
An interesting thing about the Akira is that the escape pods (EPs) and the bridge look exactly like the ones from the Sovereign, but on the Akira, the bridge is as long as 5 EPs, while on the Sovereign, it's only about 3.5 EPs. It could mean that the Akira has a different type of EP; maybe a smaller version for a smaller ship whith smaller crew...
This is why I think the EPs are no reliable indication for the ship size.

Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged
judge advocate
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hello Guys and Gals i just found this group and am interested in getting all the technical information and pictures of the Akira class vessel that you have i did notice a comparision page earlier in the group wich is most helpful but if you have more information i would be most greatful
IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Davok: The Akira bridge actually looks nothing like the Sovereign's. That was just a shortcut taken by Drexler when doing the encyclopedia diagrams. He did the same thing on the Steamrunner and Sabre, although, technically, we don't know if maybe their bridges really were the same (though I doubt it).

Oh, BTW, I cleaned up your double post.

Frank: Well, what I was reading was where someone quoted him over at Sternbach's group. They said that he said "it is almost as big as the E-E--the E is longer, but the saucer section is almost the same size." They put the quotes around it, so I assumed they were using the exact words from the mag.

------------------
"Flying Thompson's Gazelle of the Yard!"
-Inspector Fox, the Arguement Clinic sketch, Monty Python's Flying Circus


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Cargile
Nobody Special
Member # 45

 - posted      Profile for Cargile     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Frank, where is the production logic in making escape pods different sizes? They should be standard, reuseable, and interchangeable.

------------------
"Minsk."

Cmdr Worf


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Aethelwer
Frank G
Member # 36

 - posted      Profile for Aethelwer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
But, they aren't. Each ship seems to have its own kind of escape pod. Even ones that look similar, like the Intrepid's and Saber's, are still different sizes.

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
"Let's get those missiles ready to destroy the universe!" - TMBG


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Davok
Member
Member # 143

 - posted      Profile for Davok     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TSN: So, do you have a better schematic?
Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Davok: Like this one? :-)

------------------
"I ran into Charlie Fogg.
He blacked my eye, and he kicked my dog.
My dog turned to me, and he said,
'Let's head back to Tennessee, Jed.'"
-The Grateful Dead, "Tennessee Jed"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Pedro
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Actually, we've seen good pictures of all of the bridges of the FC ships, and they are all quite different.

Frank, I just re-read your Akira length page, and feel I should point out one innacuracy (which won't really change your conclusions, but...). The Excelsior shown in Favor the Bold is a CGI ship, built by Dave Lombardi ad Digital Muse, not the model. Actually, some other stuff is kind of out of date as well, you might want to update it.


IP: Logged
Aethelwer
Frank G
Member # 36

 - posted      Profile for Aethelwer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's CGI? But...I thought they were still using the Excelsior model from "Flashback" (VOY)?

What else is out of date?

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
"Let's get those missiles ready to destroy the universe!" - TMBG


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Pedro
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Not to much is out of date, just the incorrect assumption about the Excelsior, and the bit about the Akira bridge being undetailed, as well as the other FC ship bridges. It is possible that the Foundation Imaging guys spruced up the Akira bridge when they converted it to Lightwave for TV use, but I don't think so, ILM is well known for adding tons of detail to models, even if it will never be seen on screen.

I'm not 100% certain that the Excelsior was CGI. The reason that I think it was is that Dave told me he had built the CGI Excelsior, and DMuse was responsible for most of that battle scene (I believe that this was the first appearance of the CGI model). In addition, the paneling on that ship has the look of a CG model, and from what I've seen of the Flashback model, the painted details differ quite a bit (while Lombardi's CG model matches quite closely with the larger original model).


IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3