posted
You don;t know how to do images, but you know what you are doing????
Great Idea!!!!!
-------------------- "You are a terrible human, Ritten." Magnus "Urgh, you are a sick sick person..." Austin Powers A leek too, pretty much a negi.....
Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
Looks like you've a decent start made. Geocities may not be the best choice, though.
-------------------- "Out of doubt, out of dark to the day's rising I came singing in the sun, sword unsheathing. To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
The Battle of the Pelennor Fields.
Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
Ok... This would seem to be self evident...but I'll say it anyway. You don't "do" images in HTML. You can reference images, but you generally create the images in a graphics program like photoshop or something. You can also reference scanned images saved as JPEGs or GIFs.
But if you're waiting for a section to tell you how to create images using html... good luck.
I learned web design almost strictly by learning Dreamweaver. It's most likely the cheater's way... but it has served me well. I've picked up a few things about the code by watching Dreamweaver's source, but that's pretty much it.
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
Notepad = better.
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
The BWC
Ex-Member
posted
What I meant was I didn't know how to put images on a page using HTML. I'm gonna stick with Geocities for now, until I find a better one. I am using Notepad to write it and then copy it to Geocities.
IP: Logged
posted
back in 4 yrs ago during an ICT lesson in my Year7 class a friend and i had finished our projects early and our teacher said: u have until the end of the lesson to show me what u can do using HTML - which meant we had bout 40 mins to learn and then write something. after making a page with 3 sections each colored different (green, red and blue) it was a pretty good start for 40mins i suppose. but since then i havnt touch anything to do with code.
and i've heard that Dreamweaver is very good (actually did a review for it for a school ICT publication project)
neways, my 2 cents worth Buzz
-------------------- "Tom is Canadian. He thereby uses advanced humour tecniques, such as 'irony', 'sarcasm', and werid shit'. If you are not qualified in any of these, it will be risky for you to attempt to decipher what he means. Just smile and carry on." - PsyLiam; 16th June
Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
quote:What I meant was I didn't know how to put images on a page using HTML. I'm gonna stick with Geocities for now, until I find a better one.
That takes about 2 seconds
And I recommend using HomeSite, or Notepad. But no Frontpage. You could use Dreamweaver, but I still think coding HTML by hand is more direct and easier.
Seriously, why do you want to spend all your time hardcoding every page when you can do it a lot quicker in Dreamweaver or Frontpage? You can always tweak the code after...
Yeah, I understand if you're doing fairly hi-tec pages with JAVA and funky stuff, but for most basic pages a WYSIWYG package seems to be a lot less hassle.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
The BWC
Ex-Member
posted
I don't have any of those and I don't want to get them, so I'll stick with my notepad.
IP: Logged
posted
Well, I don't have anymoney to buy things, so Notepad is all I have. I just wish the accendentally instealled Dreamweaver or somethiong on my computer and I not know it. (Begins multipe disk searches)
IP: Logged
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
