posted
Well, I would like to see NCC-74205-A. But, that would contradict the idea i have about retiring ship names from UP (from last year). There should be no more ships named Defiant. That being; ship names are never used again once the names become a class. (i.e. there will never be another Excelsior) Let's hope I'm wrong!
Plus, all the Enterprises were different classes after A, so maybe the rumors about A Sovereign showing up in DS9 aren't wrong. (NCC-74205-A; U.S.S. Defiant, Sovereign class! )
------------------ All Sisko needs is ANOTHER tall ship and a star to guide her by.
The First One
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed
Member # 35
posted
See the "What We Don't Agree On" thread. Consider the Yeager-class and the Sabre-class USS Yeager. And the mention of a USS Constellation in DS9. . . then come back to us on that.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Yeah I know about that, it's what my conflict is based on. Yet in the orginal UP (i think) Stationmaster wrote into the site that names are retired once the first ship of a class is retired or destroyed.
------------------ All Sisko needs is ANOTHER tall ship and a star to steer her by.