posted
I was thinking about blowing stuff up the other day, and it got me thinking - Trek RARELY blows up its regular sets. Mostly due to budgetary concerns, they at most make the set LOOK blown up, exploding consoles instead of walls, etc. But in your estimation, what is the BEST example of Trek blowing a regular set up, and then having it better later on?
I'll start us off with my thoughts on a better example, Azati Prime. In it, the Enterprise bridge (and NO other set, I might add) is seriously blown up. I think that they did a great job scorching up the set, replacing set pieces with destroyed equivalents, etc. Dramatically, when the big circular thing above Mayweather's head dropped down, it was a notable highlight. And the icing on the cake? The bridge STAYED blowed up for the rest of the season!
Runner up? For me, probably the Reliant. Lots of stuff thrown around there, wires spiling out, giant pieces of hull falling on people... Awesome. And of course, they patch it all up later to shoot as the Enterprise.
And as a BAD example of how to blow up a set, I'd have to say the loss of teh Enterprise-D. I just wasn't convinced that so strong a ship would just sort of spontaneously fall apart like that. Basically, all they did was toss all the chairs around, removed the wall between the ready room and the bridge, and add a whole bunch of debris. Meh.
OnToMars
Now on to the making of films!
Member # 621
posted
I'll disagree with you on the destruction of the E-D bridge. I will be the first to say that Generations isn't a strong movie and the first to be pissed that they blew up the E-D without just cause. But the actual sequence of the saucer entering the atmosphere and landing is phenomenal, with the tearing up of the set going notably beyond what we had ever seen before.
Otherwise, I'm forced to give a nod to another non-favorite and say Voyager in "Year of Hell." The work they do, not only to the bridge, but all over, is superb.
-------------------- If God didn't want us to fly, he wouldn't have given us Bernoulli's Principle.
Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
With the destruction of the E-D, they pretty much had free reign on destroying the set as they weren't going to use it again.
As for a favourite set destruction, I'm not really sure. The times mentioned above are certainly up there. I found the Defiant bridge destruction was rather poignant, even though the whole destruction of the Defiant was rather pointless.
-------------------- I haul cardboard and cardboard accessories
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
WizArtist II
"How can you have a yellow alert in Spacedock? "
Member # 1425
posted
I thought the whole loss of the E-D was a joke. A lousy BOP w/ some codes can knock out the flagship of the Federation? Even in UC, the BOP attacking both the Enterprise & Excelsior didn't have that much power.
-------------------- There are 10 types of people in the world...those that understand Binary and those that don't.
Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
posted
Now, see, as far as set design goes, it wasn't much, but I thought the sabotage of Ops in "A Call to Arms" was very dramatic. That had more to do with the weird camera angles they filmed the aftermath in, though, I think.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I also liked the "call to arms" sabotage- even the motors in the airlocks were offline.
Makes me wonder what modifications the Dominion made to the station and what technological impovments the Dominion might have made to stuff like the weapons array (Rom and Kira's taking the weapons offline would have preserved most of what was there).
The Death of the Enterprise D sucked so badly because we saw only a minimal shot of the secondary hull blowing up- compare that with the protracted destruction of the A nad you feel kinda jipped. Plus the whole "re-use" of the exact scene from STVI of the KBOP blowing up sucked ass. Everyone I saw the movie with caught it and was annoyed.
While not Trek (though Partick Stewart is in it), the best alltime set/model destruction scene is in Lifeforce. They constructed an exact model of London over a six month period and blew it to hell over four days of shooting. Did not make the movie good though.
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: Plus the whole "re-use" of the exact scene from STVI of the KBOP blowing up sucked ass. Everyone I saw the movie with caught it and was annoyed.
Of course, if that's what they had to do in order to save enough money to show the Enterprise-D crashing, then it was worth it. I just don't get people who think they did it because it was "lazy".
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Mabye not "lazy" but definitely cheap. I mean fuck, it's TNG's first movie and has all this hype and they first blow any suprise by showing the ship crash in the fucking trailer and then dont even have sense to even reverse the film of the KBOP's explosion so its not identical to the climax of the last fucking movie!
The dark lighting all through the Enterprise is annoying as hell too- it's not like they had to save on lightbulbs.
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
posted
I hate watching any movie trailers now just for that reason - they practically give away the whole movie plot before you even see it!
I can't decide on the best one, but I can think of the worst (from memory, at least). That would be the Enterprise in STII. Kirk says "the bridge is smashed", but from what I can remember, all that they did was dim the lights, pump in some smoke, and singe one panel near the turbolift. Didn't look very smashed to me.
posted
Well, Kirk WAS bluffing. He was doing it to insult Khan's intelligence, etc.
Hmm... Blowing up the Valiant bridge was a fair attempt, knocking Watters AND his chair off their perch. Much of the aft of that bridge was pretty well destroyed, actually - so well that they even reused that shot amongst the droves of stock footage in the DS9 series finale. Too bad the forward end wasn't as impressive, being all exploding consoles and cadets.
quote:Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: Mabye not "lazy" but definitely cheap.
Well, duh. Trek films do not have the biggest budgets. This was the producers thinking "if we save money by reusing the nice explosion fromt the last film, we can put it elsewhere". Not "let's cut money and spend it on Jags for ourselves."
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
WizArtist II
"How can you have a yellow alert in Spacedock? "
Member # 1425
posted
Why would anyone spend the money on overpriced British cars that are half-n-half cars.
Half the time in your garage, half the time in your mechanic's garage.
-------------------- There are 10 types of people in the world...those that understand Binary and those that don't.
Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: Mabye not "lazy" but definitely cheap.
Well, duh. Trek films do not have the biggest budgets. This was the producers thinking "if we save money by reusing the nice explosion fromt the last film, we can put it elsewhere". Not "let's cut money and spend it on Jags for ourselves."
Well, it could very well have led to Whoopi GOldberg buying herself a Jag...
Really, I'd have been happy with any other KBOP explosion- I know they shot that STVI scene from several angles to get it to look "right", you'd have thought one of those would have been useable enough to spare us the stock footage treatment.
Meh. I was far more annoyed that they showed the Enterprise crashing in the trailer- during the movie I kept saying to myself "it's okay: they'll do the whole "Nexus timetravel bit to save the ship".
But they didn't.
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
