Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » General Trek » New T'Pol look (Page 3)

  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   
Author Topic: New T'Pol look
Mountain Man
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Someone mentioned T'pol being blonde.Well I ran across a bunch of nude photos of miss Blaylock, blonde and very much Non Vulcan in her poses.That young lady could have my ranch and all my cattle. [Smile]
IP: Logged
Gvsualan
Perpetual Member
Member # 968

 - posted      Profile for Gvsualan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ah, yes, dear Maxim, Playboy's heir-apparent. [Wink]

--------------------
Hey, it only took 13 years for me to figure out my password...

Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Mountain Man
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Not the Maxim pics though they were nice.These were all the way more like the old penthouse.Nothing left to the imagination.They were on her official site but suddenly disapeared.Too bad my printer was screwed up.Probably never see those again.
IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Right.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Lee
I'm a spy now. Spies are cool.
Member # 393

 - posted      Profile for Lee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes. No doubt you found the Britney Spears hardcore porn flick on her official site, only you didn't have the right codec and then it likewise mysteriously disappeared.

I mean, the phrase "right-click, save as" never once occurred to you while perusing the alleged Penthouse-style pics of Ms. Blalock? Come on.

--------------------
Never mind the Phlox - Here's the Phase Pistols

Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged
Mountain Man
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Never really thought about it just ran a websearch and found one of the pictures.It's on a different webpage than the one I remember.The first time I saw it was a couple of months after Enterprise first aired.That Page was titled official,Or Oficial Fansite, but of course that doesn't mean it was.I printed the picture this time.Looking closely,(Just for the sake of accuracy you understand)I have to say that the picture may be a fake.It's Suposed to be an outdoor scene but the edges show signs that you might expect from a blue screen.Oh well there goes that fantasy.I could give you the address of the page but it would be a waste of time.
IP: Logged
Lee
I'm a spy now. Spies are cool.
Member # 393

 - posted      Profile for Lee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'd like to say I've seen enough of La Blalock's photoshoots to say I've never seen one with an outdoorsy setting, but the truth is she's done so many for Maxim, FHM etc., I'm surprised she has time to appear in a weekly TV show. But put it this way, she's never done proper topless, let alone exposed front bottom shots; so, if you saw either, they were fake.

--------------------
Never mind the Phlox - Here's the Phase Pistols

Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged
Mountain Man
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yeah I finally realized that when I studied the picture closely.The edges of the figure were what gave it away.Thats pobably why the Webpage that it was originaly on disappeared.Actually after some of the stuff that appeared in the magazines over the years all this counterfeit stuff sort of took me by suprize.Guess thats a good one on me.HA [Big Grin]
IP: Logged
Bernd
Guy from Old Europe
Member # 6

 - posted      Profile for Bernd     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
The episode in which Ro & Riker get it on and Worf plays Boss and everyone else is like: "Who are we? What do we want? Why are we here?"
Is it possible to delete that portion of the thread? Seriously, if an ENT writer comes here, he may come up with some homage (of course, with an entirely new plot)...

--------------------
Bernd Schneider

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MrNeutron
Senior Member
Member # 524

 - posted      Profile for MrNeutron     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Reverend:
Star_Trek_Enterprise_to_receive_makeover

I just love this reasoning.

quote:
"Of the Star Trek movies, two of the most successful and popular, amongst both the general box office and the fans, were Star Trek IV — the one about the whales — and Star Trek: First Contact. They were both movies that dealt with impending destruction of the Earth, huge stakes that Enterprise and its crew had to go out and undo. So our thought was that, rather than just have a general mission of exploring space peacefully, [we'd] do a portion or maybe even an entire season where we had a very specific and a very immediate and a very dangerous situation."
I guess he missed the box office reports for Nemesis and ST:I.
I don't have the box office for Insurrection and Nemsis handy, but for a piece I wrote some years ago I did some math of the box-office for the Trek films released to date. This is what I came up with:

Just how much money did each of the Trek films make? Well, although generally profitable for Paramount, the series never reached the box-office heights of a Star Wars or Titanic. In fact, even adjusted for inflation, none of the Star Trek films are even in the top 100 moneymaking films.

Here�s a ranking of the Trek movies ranked from highest to lowest box-office, in millions of dollars:

The figures below are in order: RANK, DOMESTIC BOX OFFICE, OVERSEAS BOX OFFICE, WORLWIDE TOTAL, AND FILM NAME. Where I could not find a figure, I left a blank ___:

1 $109.7 ___ $109.7 The Voyage Home (1986)
2 $ 92.0 $ 54.0 $146.0 First Contact (1996)
3 $ 82.3 $ 51.0 $ 133.3 The Motion Picture (1979)
4 $ 78.9 ___ $ 78.9 The Wrath of Khan (1982)
5 $ 76.4 ___ $ 76.4 The Search for Spock (1984)
6 $ 75.7 $ 42.4 $118.1 Generations (1994)
7 $ 74.9 $ 22.0 $ 96.9 The Undiscovered Country (1991)
8 $ 55.2 ___ $ 55.2 The Final Frontier (1989)
TOTAL $645.0 $169.4 $814.4

They say figures can be misleading, and, indeed, they are. Everyone may say that Titanic made more money than Star Wars, but movie ticket prices are not static. If you adjust the grosses for films to compensate for inflation, you get some very different results. In the case of Star Trek, we see some significant shuffling. First Contact goes from #1 to #5, Khan and Generations swap their positions. Interestingly, The Final Frontier remains firmly buried at the bottom of the heap.

Adjusted for inflation (1998 dollars):

RANK DOM OVER WORLD FILM
1 $145.6 $ 90.2 $235.8 The Motion Picture (1979)
2 $129.2 ___ $129.2 The Voyage Home (1986)
3 $109.5 ___ $109.5 The Wrath of Khan (1982)
4 $ 99.3 __ $ 99.3 The Search for Spock (1984)
5 $ 92.0 $ 54.0 $146.0 First Contact (1996)
6 $ 79.1 $ 44.4 $ 123.5 Generations (1994)
7 $ 77.8 $ 22.9 $ 100.7 The Undiscovered Country (1991)
8 $ 57.2 ___ $ 57.2 The Final Frontier (1989)

It�s interesting to note that, adjusted for inflation, the much-maligned TMP raked in more domestic bucks than any of its follow-ups. In fact, the average gross domestic box-office for a Trek film (in 1998 dollars) is about $98.7 million, and TMP came in at a whopping 1.48 times that figure, whereas a First Contact, which is widely considered a better and more popular film, came in right on the average, whileGenerations and TUC, both also considered better and more popular, came in considerably below average.

Why which films were more successful at the box office is another subject entirely. [Wink]

--------------------
"Well, I mean, it's generally understood that, of all of the people in the world, Mike Nelson is the best." -- ULTRA MAGNUS, steadfast in curmudgeon

Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3