Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » General Trek » Production Beginning on Series V? (Page 2)

  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   
Author Topic: Production Beginning on Series V?
trekfan2k
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I agree. If the Series was pre-TOS, I think it would, the story-line would be boring because of the lost of so much technology which has been developed over the past series.

------------------
"You left spacedock without a tractor beam?"

"It won't be installed until Tuesday."

-Captain James T. Kirk to Captain John Harriman


IP: Logged
Michael Dracon
aka: NightWing or Altair
Member # 4

 - posted      Profile for Michael Dracon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well guys and girls. Looks like we'll get to see a new Star Trek series THIS YEAR!
http://www.trektoday.com/news/150201_06.shtml

And guess what:

quote:
SFX Network understands, from our Trek spy sources, that the new series will indeed be set in the early days of the Federation

------------------
Terry: "Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, ...."
Max: "And?"
Terry: "I forgot."
Max: "Come on, Clinton was the fun one, then came the boring one."
Terry: "They're all boring."

- Batman Beyond (aka: Batman of the Future)

[This message has been edited by Altair (edited February 16, 2001).]


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Horse puckey.

------------------
"My knowledge and experience far exceeds your own, by, oh, about a BILLION times!" -- Q



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Wes
Over 20 years here? Holy cow.
Member # 212

 - posted      Profile for Wes     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I hope so, cause the Star Trek Series V staff goes on payroll (for Series V) on Monday, and they don't get paid for nothing.

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
Janeway: "Dimissed"
Neelix: [stands there dumbfounded] "b..but.."
Janeway: "That's Starfleet for get out"



Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Star Trek: The Prisoner would be kick ass, by the way, if only due to its lineage.

This "concept that doesn't require the name Star Trek" thing has me totally confused, though. What the heck does that mean? A Trek series that isn't a Trek series? Maybe Braga is planning a trip into postmodern metafiction as pioneered in "Far Beyond The Stars." Which, actually, might make for a pretty good series, but I really doubt that's the concept.

I thought it might be a ploy to make the show more appealing to the major networks, if these rumors of NBC or ABC interest are true. Again, it's a pretty big leap, as no reliable source has said anything about those networks being interested. Plus, it seems that in today's wintery TV SF climate, having a brand name would be a good thing, not a bad thing. But who knows?

------------------
I will shout until they know what I mean.
--
Neutral Milk Hotel
****
Read three (three!) chapters of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"! Then, go insane!



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My source's mole has told me two things.

Prequel.

Enterprise.

Shhhhhhh...

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 6.27 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with four eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Forum Member Who Shall Be Nameless. 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001


[This message has been edited by JeffKardde (edited February 17, 2001).]


Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mole:
1. a small destructive pest, often blind, that lives in dirt.
2. an unsightly, precancerous growth on the skin.
3. a source of highly dubious information.
4. a lame survivor-based Tv show.

------------------
"My knowledge and experience far exceeds your own, by, oh, about a BILLION times!" -- Q



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hah-hah.

Actually, my source is Dennis Bailey -- you might know of him, he co-wrote Tin Man and First Contact, and almost got hired as a staff writer for TNG (he submitted Tin Man as a spec script with David Bischoff), and did the re-write on First Contact.

Er, First Contact the episode not the film, that is.

I'd lay odds on his "mole" being Mike Okuda, actually.

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 6.27 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with four eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Forum Member Who Shall Be Nameless. 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001



Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Antagonist
Active Member
Member # 484

 - posted      Profile for Antagonist     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
*tears his hair out*
NOOOOOO!

A prequel is something that should have been done before Voy, or even DS9. Now that there are three, maybe four series' ahead of this "prequel" (if in fact that is what it is), then there are too many boundaries that have been laid down. The future is certain, and though there is alot of space to make good story telling, it isn't enough in my opinion to base a series off of. I think, or perhaps hope, that your "source's source" is just spreading disinformation.

By the way, what is this 'Star Trek: The Prisoner" idea you keep talking about? I haven't heard of any such thing.

------------------
Call me Musashi!!!
-Andy


Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I vaguely remember an interview with, eh, someone on the DS9 writing staff who said that they had discussed whether they could take the Star Trek name off of DS9.

I don't think they ever seriously considered it, but they wondered whether to go whole hog for a different audience. The type that, say, don't watch Star Trek, but will watch B5, or Farscape.

------------------
"And Mojo was hurt and I would have kissed his little boo boo but then I realized he was a BAD monkey so I KICKED HIM IN HIS FACE!"
-Bubbles


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Has anyone noticed the amount of hologram episodes... I'm picturing a series featuring a large amount of holograms... sort of how ds9 had the maquis to set up voyager and tng had bajorans to set up ds9...

Robert Picardo could be the lead!?!

Holoship? A la Red Dwarf?

------------------
"This is cooling, faster than I can..." Tori Amos "Cooling"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Aban Rune
Former ascended being
Member # 226

 - posted      Profile for Aban Rune     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Technically, an Enterprise B or C series would be a prequel to the TNG era stuff. I've always thought an Ent B series would be great. It could fill in the gaps in Klingon/Federation relations as well as round out some things with some of the TOS era aliens and events. A "C" series would run into problems as we all know how it ends. A "B" or "C" series would also eventually come up against some continuity problems.

------------------
"You don't tug on Superman's cape.
You don't spit into the wind.
You don't pull the mask off the ole' Lone Ranger
And you don't mess around with Jim."
Aban's Illustration www.alanfore.com


Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have decided to maintain my aura of complete non-belief until the first screencaps and pics start coming down the pike.

------------------
The government that seems the most unwise, oft goodness to the people best supplies. That which is meddling, touching everything, will work but ill, and disappointment bring. - The Tao Te Ching

[This message has been edited by First of Two (edited February 23, 2001).]


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Curry Monster
Somewhere in Australia
Member # 12

 - posted      Profile for Curry Monster     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Umm. Let me try my 'mole'. He tends to have things straight up.

------------------
Re: Russia in WWII

"Hey, we butchered Poles! Thats OK."
- DT.


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You really should get that seen to.

------------------
"And Mojo was hurt and I would have kissed his little boo boo but then I realized he was a BAD monkey so I KICKED HIM IN HIS FACE!"
-Bubbles


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3