posted
Okay then, was an *actual* stardate included in that same episode? 'Cuz if not, then Neelix's departure could be slapped in just about anywhere in the year (as long as the other Neelix episodes are also undated).
Mark
------------------ "Why build one, when you can have two at twice the price?"
posted
Hmm... then it seems that Voyager may be speeding up time somewhat. Perhaps that explains why Naomi claims to be so much older in this ep?
------------------ "How do you define fool?" "I don't attempt it. I wait for demonstrations. They inevitably surpass my imagination." - CJ Cherryh, Invader
posted
According to the Star Trek Enyclopedia, Voyager was lost in 2371, stardat 48***. I don't recall the stardate, but added it anyways. Whoever said that the last number of the year matches the number of seasons is correct. Therefore if it is season 7 we are talking about then it would be 2377, or stardate 55***.
posted
In the episode "Non Sequitor", there is a sign announcing a festival in SF in August. I believe the stardate is 490xx. If this is correct, then the stardate year is from summer to summer, not winter to winter. This corresponds to the seasonal cycle of tv shows.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
