posted
Hey,Cubic, can you post that theory in another thread? And call that thread, say "Explaining various technobabble". You know, I have some ideas on subspace and warp, and I'd like to have some thechnobabble explaination...
A point on disruptors: Disruptors use a combination of low-energy nadions and chromions to cause damage.Nadions disable some of bonds, weakening them, while chromions eats them away, so binding energy is lost again.Such pattern of shot's cmposition makes it very effective agains armor, but , in turn, it doesn't allow to use multiple emitters, or they will burn each other out.
[ December 11, 2001: Message edited by: Nevod ]
-------------------- Fear is the ultimate enemy.And unreasoning is second that.
Registered: Nov 2001
| IP: Logged
Cubic Centimeter
Ex-Member
posted
quote:Originally posted by David Templar: Damn fine theory, almost as fine as my "bunnies are soft" theory. The major difference is that mine can be backed up. Still, that's some damn impressive technobabble.
Why, thank you. I had to have it fit with what was known, as much as I could remember. But I don't really consider it true technobabble, per se. Technobabble, to me, is like "demodulate the flarndip amplifiers and rotate hyperalgorithmic transduction nutation"; you know, Voyager-esque
I think my "theory" sounds ok, at least. I mean, gluons are real particles and they do hold quarks together, and disrupting their exchange would have some weird effects. But yes, it is a form of TB.
Still, that's some damn impressive technobabble.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
