Flare Sci-Fi Forums: Where did the Curry's info originally come from?

my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

»	Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Where did the Curry's info originally come from? (Page 2)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Author

Topic: Where did the Curry's info originally come from?

Dax
Paradox
Member # 191

posted

It wouldn't surprise me if the Raging Queen and the Curry are two different miniatures. I've got "A Time to Stand" on video and I don't consider their battle damage to match. The saucer front damage on the Curry looks larger than the Queen. Also, the Curry completely lacks the damage to the saucer spine.

--------------------
"I exist here."
- Sisko in "Emissary"
Dax's Ships of Star Trek

Registered: Jul 1999 | IP: Logged

J
Active Member
Member # 608

posted

So you're wanting to change the name from "Shelly/Curry" to "Raging Carrie" I mean "Raging Curry"

...

Sorry, couldn't resist.

--------------------
Later, J
_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _
The Last Person to post in the late Voyager Forum. Bashing both Voyager, Enterprise, and "The Bun" in one glorious post.

[email protected]
http://webj.cjb.net

Registered: May 2001 | IP: Logged

The Mighty Monkey of Mim
SUPPOSED TO HAVE ICE POWERS!!
Member # 646

posted

Sorry, wrong thread. [Roll Eyes]

[ March 20, 2002, 07:46: Message edited by: The Mighty Monkey of Mim ]

--------------------
The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.

Registered: Jun 2001 | IP: Logged

capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

posted

*buh?* are you answering me in that other thread?

--------------------
"Are you worried that your thoughts are not quite.. clear?"

Registered: Sep 2001 | IP: Logged

Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

posted

Not to throw fuel on the kitbashed/"real" class fire, but the slightly unusual font and lack of USS suggests to me that this is what we might expect a kitbashed ship with no official name to look like.

Registered: Mar 1999 | IP: Logged

Mikey T
Driven
Member # 144

posted

I don't know... if there is a Starfleet vessel called the Raging Queen, I'd think that the people in charge of naming the ships are having Romulan Ale too often...

--------------------
"It speaks to some basic human needs: that there is a tomorrow, it's not all going to be over with a big splash and a bomb, that the human race is improving, that we have things to be proud of as humans."
-Gene Roddenberry about Star Trek

Registered: May 1999 | IP: Logged

MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

posted

quote:
Originally posted by Sol System:
Not to throw fuel on the kitbashed/"real" class fire, but the slightly unusual font and lack of USS suggests to me that this is what we might expect a kitbashed ship with no official name to look like.

Really? I'd think that if they were going to take the time to paint the hull at all, they'd be able to take the time to get it right. I mean -- it's not THAT difficult to paint some panels in a matching style, is it?

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000 | IP: Logged

Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

posted

I think you misunderstand me. I meant to say that a ship unofficially named by its crew may very well feature that named painted in a unique way. Witness the Bounty. In other words, why wouldn't they be creative about it?

Registered: Mar 1999 | IP: Logged

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Printer-friendly view of this topic