Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Hideki size? (Page 2)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Hideki size?
Boris
Active Member
Member # 713

 - posted      Profile for Boris     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks. The docking port just looked like a possibility, especially since the claws seem movable.

I checked the relevant scripts:

"Profit and Loss":

There's no mention of the ship being a freighter; the script simply describes it as a "small Cardassian ship". Dax says it's "definitely Cardassian" and doesn't describe it further; the important thing is that nobody's wondering why a teacher should be commanding a military ship. Maybe we ought to see it as a civilian variant.

The ship looks rough and is damaged because it had taken some pounding from the Cardassian disruptors while running away. Although Natima does say that she's "not much of a shuttle pilot", she then calls it a ship, as does everyone else. Furthermore, Quark says:

I've installed the cloaking device
in your central engine core. You
can activate it from the bridge as
soon as the mooring clamps are
released. Then I suggest you take
your ship to warp eight and don't
look back.

...suggesting that it probably isn't just any shuttle, with a maximum speed of probably Warp 8. Still, The cloaking device used is relatively small. Only three people were aboard, but this doesn't tell us much; after all, Picard and Riker were able to run the Enterprise-D in "11001001".

"Tribunal":

The computer describes it as a "Cardassian patrol ship, Hideki-class." That ought to be seen as the official class name and designation for this ship, given the source (Lwaxana Troi).

"Sacrifice of Angels":

A script note mentions "Hideki-class Dominion fighters". The writers obviously consider these ships identical to the patrol ships from "Tribunal."

"Tacking into the Wind":

Here, it's simply called a Cardassian shuttle. It was probably intended to be a different model altogether.

Conclusion: If I were Jim Martin reading the "Profit and Loss" script, I probably wouldn't design something that's 152m long. It would be a cross between a shuttle and a small ship; his Defiant concepts seem to fit the description perfectly, as does Doug Drexler's size if we correct it down to 60m. In "Tribunal", there would've been no need to scale up the ship.

On the other hand, it is likely that when the size of the Jem'Hadar attack ships was increased from 100m to 152m to match the 171m Defiant, so was the size of the Hidekis (at least by David Stipes). Unfortunately, the Hidekis are mostly seen next to Galors, and they aren't supposed to be small.

Perhaps we should distinguish between a 20-30m Hideki "shuttle" and a 152m Hideki fighter/patrol ship? After all, we really can't use DS9 as a size reference in "Profit and Loss," and there is the "shuttle" line common to the two episodes.

Another possibility is to ignore the large Hidekis altogether and use a 60m size for everything but the Cardassian shuttle, taking into account the fact that we've seen smaller Hidekis in the war arc likewise. Maybe we could also take into account the "shuttle pilot" line from "Profit and Loss" as a proof that Cardassians have a different meaning for the word shuttle, and use only one Hideki, regardless of the VFX from "Tacking into the Wind"?

[ March 25, 2002, 09:35: Message edited by: Boris ]

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Bernd said: As usual, I plead for establishing only one size. The question is if this should be rather something like an "original size" (if there was ever one) or an average of the VFX sizes, ignoring only the most blatant scaling errors (like the huge BoPs in "The Defector" too).
I know there is the whole BOP debate - and your page on this is very good - but there has to be SOME allowances for those huge BOPs in The Defector - since Picard/Tomalok was confidant that a Galaxy against 3 Warbirds = death but a Galaxy + 3 BOP = 3 Warbirds or even overpowers them.

[ March 26, 2002, 02:40: Message edited by: AndrewR ]

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I wouldn't call the P&L ship a shuttle after those Warp 8 and Bridge lines...

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
And actually, it makes sense for a Cardassian military patrol ship to be capable of high speeds up to Warp 8.

I just thought of something -- what if Lang and her two associates actually STOLE that ship? That would explain the military-ship-in-the-hands-of-civilians bit. And we know that Lang and Co. were desperate to get away...

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Boris
Active Member
Member # 713

 - posted      Profile for Boris     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There's no need to suggest that the ship was stolen; maybe it was assigned to her by the Cardassian government, given her previous position as a teacher, especially since Cardassia is a military dictatorship at the time. We know that the Cardassians care a lot for education and their children, hence sparing a downgraded military ship as a teaching tool doesn't seem terribly inconsistent.

As for the size, I think that a 152m Hideki patrol ship/teaching variant/fighter fits the evidence best, along with a 15m shuttle. It was probably meant to be smaller, but the average of the shots in all the episodes suggests a greater size, and we don't want to postulate several classes.

OR, if we want to take into account what was originally designed, maybe we could stick with 110m as a compromise, which happens to be roughly the average between the likely intended size (60m) and the new VFX size, and doesn't feel so big anymore for a teacher and three students.

OR, we could use the official size of 86m for simplicity and consistency.

The problem with the last two options is that they really won't fit the relationships with the Galors and other big ships, where the Hidekis appear to be almost capital ships.

[ March 26, 2002, 11:02: Message edited by: Boris ]

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Dax
Paradox
Member # 191

 - posted      Profile for Dax     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm for 500'.

--------------------
"I exist here."
- Sisko in "Emissary"
Dax's Ships of Star Trek

Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dax... what is this with feet! You live in Australia! [Roll Eyes] [Wink]

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Dax
Paradox
Member # 191

 - posted      Profile for Dax     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I do live in Australia but the Trek VFX guys don't. Although I otherwise use metric it can be useful to have an understanding of the imperial system when dealing with ship lengths. Even so, I still quote metric only on my website.

--------------------
"I exist here."
- Sisko in "Emissary"
Dax's Ships of Star Trek

Registered: Jul 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3