posted
Anyone have info on how the effect was created in TOS showing planets in space, when the E was in orbit, etc. Just wondering if they used a painted sphere or if it was flat artwork rotated under a matte.
-------------------- Never fear... Sargon is here.
Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged
posted
They had to have painted a sphere, because several times we saw a body rotating behind the ship. Or at least changing a bit of perspective as they passed...
-------------------- “Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha
Registered: Nov 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
If you can find it somewhere, I think that the 30th anniversary Trek issue from CINEFANTASTIQUE has got a good hunk of material on the fx end of things, and there are some credible sounding quotes in there. As I recall, Westheimer and at least one of the other fx houses used a rotating globe, but from some shows, I think other companies just matted animated artwork onto a circle shape.
I interviewed Richard Edlund a number of years back, and tried to get him to talk about the Trek FX (working at Westheimer was one of his first jobs, a full decade prior to his being the #2 guy at ILM on STAR WARS), but he seemed really embarassed about Trek and just changed the subject back to SW. Strange, cuz a lot of the planet fx in TOS look much better than early NextGen, with their dog turd shoeprints mapped onto spheres and such. Except for NASA reference stuff, I don't think I remember any planets looking good on NextGen till about yr 5 or so.
-------------------- Achievement is its own reward; pride obscures it.
Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged
posted
What episodes of TNG used NASA reference stuff, out of curiousity? I do vaguely recall that some planets in TNG looked a lot more detailed than others (Mintaka III, for instance).
What about Earth, in both TNG and TOS (and DS9's "Past Tense", for that matter)? How was that done?
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709
posted
ive seen behind the scenes pictures of both TOS and TNG effects teams having large spherical planet models on filming stands, although i do hold the belief that certain planets on TOS were made using a sliding matte.. also, i believe that TOS made different planets by adjusting or inverting the hue and color scheme of some basic original planet footage.
TOS's Earth was a globe, topographically accurate but lacking any indication of clouds whatsoever..
Mintaka was detailed because they needed it to look breathtaking for the scenes where it freaks the shit out of the Mintakan chick.. basically, the planets that werent meant to be noticed were cheaply detailed unless the script called for more detail
Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
So since Earth was the only planet in TNG to have clouds ( that I recall ), were they just painted on the globe, or animated later?
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
I don't know of ANY instance when NextGen used a globe, they just wrapped textures (be it photographic or some other) on sphere shapes in the computer, or in some cases on circle shapes in the computer. You can get some good bg on early NextGen stuff in Cinefex 37, out of print, but on ebay on occasion (I'll be selling mine soon enough)
As for when TNG started using (or modifying) NASA reference for textures, I'm pretty sure it was with FAMILY or BOBW, since prior to that the planets all look pretty bad.
There were some custom cloud effects done on TNG using nitrogen gas, like the Matt Freuer episode, while for GENERATIONS, ILM used cg cloud stuff over a planetscape that was based in large part on images of rusty corroded metal.
Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709
posted
one of the DVD bonuses that someone took caps from showed the TNG art area, there were lots of familiar items present from the TNG era, and there was a globe on a filming stand.. i believe it was a series of caps that we were trying to identify a Nebula variant on an artists des or somesuch
Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
As recently as TMP (and well after that), spherical models were used in Trek. During my visit to Stage Nine, I saw the Jupiter model used in the Enterprise's exit from the solar system. A very nicely airbrushed representation. Rapping on it with a knuckle, it felt like a billiard ball.
posted
From the original title sequence, or the third season one?
Actually, did the third season one even have Jupiter in it?
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709
posted
the third season credits no longer featured the Sol system but instead other more colorful stellar phenomena.. it was the same for the rest of the series, except for season 5 where the title text was on fire for no reason, and season 6 or 7 they started having exaggerated capital letters on the casts names
Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
I was referring to TMP, as I stated. When the Enterprise leaves the solar system, it passes Jupiter -- which was an airbrushed model about 3 feet in diameter.
But aren't the planets shown in the third season TNG title sequence still awfully similar to Sol system planets? I'm sure they show a planet that looks at least a fair bit like Jupiter. Or Saturn. Ahh, memory is bad!
And what was up with that 5th season 3d title thing anyway?
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709
posted
http://lobotomy.pleh.net/~flareupload/uploads/293/okuda.jpg here's the cap i remember.. from the 'did Okuda put his disk on teh Nebula or is it a variant *pant pant drool drool* thread' ... prob'ly is Jupiter.. i wonder .. did they use the same Jupiter for TMP -> TNG s1+2 opening -> any other jovian appearance?
the s3-on version of the TNG opening shows an energy field, then a comet flying towards a sun, flashes to a red moon around a gray crater-planet, then a ringed planet with eruptions on its surface (that make sound effects!).. certainly they are Sol System-like planets, but d0nt seem to represent the actual system anymore (i believe i read about this somewhere, after s1 and s2 passed someone watched the titles and was like "How come theyre still flying around near Earth.. lets actually have the opening take place someplace where no man has gone before or something"
Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
That Jupiter model looks a lot more detailed than the the one used for season 1+2.
And I'm pretty sure that's the milky way, rather than a sun that the comet is flying towards in the title sequence. Hang on, let me find screengrabs.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Printer-friendly view of this topic
